- From: Clemm, Geoff <gclemm@rational.com>
- Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 15:39:51 -0400
- To: Webdav WG <w3c-dist-auth@w3c.org>
- Message-ID: <E4F2D33B98DF7E4880884B9F0E6FDEE25ED4D5@SUS-MA1IT01>
Possibly we should have two pairs of standard properties: DAV:quota DAV:quota-used DAV:current-user-quota DAV:current-user-quota-used (analogous to the way the ACL draft as current-user privileges) Cheers, Geoff -----Original Message----- From: Julian Reschke [mailto:julian.reschke@gmx.de] Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 3:00 PM To: Brian Korver Cc: Webdav WG Subject: RE: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt Brian, > From: Brian Korver [mailto:briank@xythos.com] > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 8:56 PM > To: Julian Reschke > Cc: Webdav WG > Subject: Re: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-dusseault-dav-quota-01.txt > > > On Wednesday, October 23, 2002, at 10:05 AM, Julian Reschke wrote: > > This kind of quota system is incompatible with the quota system in a > > Unix > > filesystem (where AFAIK it's per user) -- a standard proposal must be > > able > > to handle these kinds of systems as well. > > In BSD anyhow, quotas are applied to users and/or groups. That said, > "collection quotas" (if we can even call them that) are generally enforced > by mounting appropriately-sized partitions. Just FYI. Interesting. So if we take groups into account, we'll need a more flexible reporting mechanism, right? Julian -- <green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
Received on Wednesday, 23 October 2002 15:40:24 UTC