- From: Stefan Eissing <stefan.eissing@greenbytes.de>
- Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 09:24:40 +0200
- To: "Clemm, Geoff" <gclemm@rational.com>
- Cc: "'Webdav WG'" <w3c-dist-auth@w3c.org>
Sounds good. Am Mittwoch, 09.10.02, um 22:50 Uhr (Europe/Berlin) schrieb Clemm, Geoff: > From: Stefan Eissing [mailto:stefan.eissing@greenbytes.de] > > > > Geoff, you say in GULP4: > > > > > > - If a request would modify the content, dead properties, or > > > bindings of a locked resource, the request MUST fail unless the > > > lock-token for that lock is specified in the request. > > > > > > What are the "bindings of a locked resource"? The complete > > > DAV:parent-set of the resource or a specific binding or the > > > bindings of the resource and all its parents? > > > The bindings of a resource identify its internal members (and > > therefore only a collection has bindings). The bindings "to" a > > resource would be identified in the DAV:parent-set. I should > > reword this to make sure nobody is confused ... any suggestions? > > How about: > > "If a request would modify the content, dead properties, or the set > of bindings to children of a locked resource, the request MUST fail > unless the lock-token for that lock is specified in the request." > > Or how about: > > "If a request would modify the content or dead properties of a locked > resource, or would modify the bindings of a locked collection, the > request MUST fail unless the lock-token for that lock is specified in > the request." > > Cheers, > Geoff >
Received on Thursday, 10 October 2002 03:28:02 UTC