- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 09:47:56 +0200
- To: "Clemm, Geoff" <gclemm@rational.com>, "'Webdav WG'" <w3c-dist-auth@w3c.org>
> From: w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org]On > Behalf Of Clemm, Geoff > Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 11:00 PM > To: 'Webdav WG' > Subject: GULP (version 5) > > .. > > - If a request would modify the content or dead properties of a locked > resource, or would modify the bindings of a locked collection, the > request MUST fail unless the lock-token for that lock is submitted in > the request. > > ... Again, this is incomplete. We really need to get to a proper definition about what the state of a resource is. At a minimun, it consists of: - content - dead properties - internal members (for collections) and - *some* live properties (DAV:lockdiscovery, DAV:getcontenttype, DAV:label-set, DAV:checked-in...) Not that I like it but maybe any definition of live properties will have to specify whether the property would be proteced by a lock? Julian -- <green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
Received on Friday, 11 October 2002 03:48:31 UTC