Saturday, 30 June 2001
Friday, 29 June 2001
- RE: Status code for creating lock-null resource
- RE: Recommendations for integrating WebDAV and other applications
- RE: Status code for creating lock-null resource
- RE: Status code for creating lock-null resource
- RE: WebDAV and write access discovery
- RE: Recommendations for integrating WebDAV and other applications
- WebDAV and write access discovery
- Re: Recommendations for integrating WebDAV and other applications
- RE: Recommendations for integrating WebDAV and other applications
Thursday, 28 June 2001
- Recommendations for integrating WebDAV and other applications
- RE: Status code for creating lock-null resource
- RE: Status code for creating lock-null resource
- RE: Status code for creating lock-null resource
- RE: Status code for creating lock-null resource
- RE: Status code for creating lock-null resource
- RE: Status code for creating lock-null resource
- RE: Status code for creating lock-null resource
- RE: Status code for creating lock-null resource
- RE: Status code for creating lock-null resource
- RE: Status code for creating lock-null resource
- Re: Why HTTP/1.1 in MKCOL requests?
- Why HTTP/1.1 in MKCOL requests?
- Re: Status code for creating lock-null resource
- RE: Status code for creating lock-null resource
Wednesday, 27 June 2001
- RE: Status code for creating lock-null resource
- RE: Status code for creating lock-null resource
- RE: Status code for creating lock-null resource
- RE: Status code for creating lock-null resource
- RE: Status code for creating lock-null resource
- RE: lock-discovery property without a lock-token
- Re: token-less lock-discovery
- RE: Are you using lock discovery?
- RE: Are you using lock discovery?
- RE: Are you using lock discovery?
- AW: Are you using lock discovery?
- RE: Status code for creating lock-null resource
- RE: Are you using lock discovery?
- RE: Are you using lock discovery?
- FW: [Moderator Action] Re: Are you using lock discovery?
Tuesday, 26 June 2001
- RE: Are you using lock discovery?
- RE: Are you using lock discovery?
- FW: [Moderator Action] WebDAV and strong authentication
- RE: Are you using lock discovery?
- Re: Are you using lock discovery?
- question of PROPPATCH method
- RE: Proposal for marshalling property type information
- RE: New (minor) issue for RFC-2518: revising wording in section 8 .3
- RE: Proposal for marshalling property type information
- Re: New (minor) issue for RFC-2518: revising wording in section 8.3
Monday, 25 June 2001
- RE: Proposal for marshalling property type information
- Re: MOVE fails on collection when IP address is used in the Destination header.
- RE: MOVE fails on collection when IP address is used in the Destination header.
- Are you using lock discovery?
- RE: MOVE fails on collection when IP address is used in the Destination header.
- RE:MOVE fails on collection when IP address is used in the Destination header.
- MOVE fails on collection when IP address is used in the Destination header.
- New (minor) issue for RFC-2518: revising wording in section 8.3
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-webdav-acl-06.txt
Sunday, 24 June 2001
Friday, 22 June 2001
- IF header question
- RE: Is this LOCK model correct?
- Re: Obscure HTTP 1.1 header of the day...
- RE: Obscure HTTP 1.1 header of the day...
- RE: Moving DASL to Experimental
- RE: Minor corrections needed in IF header examples ?
- RE: Can you BIND lock-null resources?
- Last Call: Access Control Protocol
- Can you BIND lock-null resources?
Thursday, 21 June 2001
- Re: Obscure HTTP 1.1 header of the day...
- Obscure HTTP 1.1 header of the day...
- Minor corrections needed in IF header examples ?
- RE: Error Messages
- RE: Moving DASL to Experimental
- Error Messages
- On metadata (was: RE: Status code for creating lock-null resource)
- RE: Status code for creating lock-null resource
- RE: Status code for creating lock-null resource
- RE: Status code for creating lock-null resource
- RE: Is this LOCK model correct?
- RE: Status code for creating lock-null resource
- RE: Status code for creating lock-null resource
- Re: Is this LOCK model correct?
- Is this LOCK model correct?
Wednesday, 20 June 2001
- RE: Status code for creating lock-null resource
- RE: Status code for creating lock-null resource
- RE: Newbie questions
Tuesday, 19 June 2001
- Re: Newbie questions
- RE: Issue: XML_LANG_CLARIFY
- RE: Proposal for marshalling property type information
- RE: Proposal for marshalling property type information
- Newbie questions
Monday, 18 June 2001
- RE: Proposal for marshalling property type information
- RE: Proposal for marshalling property type information
- Re: Why MKCOL/PUT can't automatically create ancestor collections?
- RE: Status code for creating lock-null resource
- RE: Proposal for marshalling property type information
- AW: Status code for creating lock-null resource
- RE: Status code for creating lock-null resource
Friday, 15 June 2001
- RE: Status code for creating lock-null resource
- RE: Status code for creating lock-null resource
- RE: questions about WebDAV methods
- RE: Status code for creating lock-null resource
- RE: Status code for creating lock-null resource
- RE: Proposal for marshalling property type information
- RE: Status code for creating lock-null resource
- RE: Proposal for marshalling property type information
- RE: Status code for creating lock-null resource
- RE: questions about WebDAV methods
- RE: what is lock-null resource
- Re: questions about WebDAV methods
- RE: Status code for creating lock-null resource
Thursday, 14 June 2001
- questions about WebDAV methods
- Status code for creating lock-null resource
- RE: what is lock-null resource
- what is lock-null resource
- RE: Proposal for marshalling property type information
- RE: Proposal for marshalling property type information
- RE: Proposal for marshalling property type information
- RE: Proposal for marshalling property type information
- RE: Moving DASL to Experimental
Wednesday, 13 June 2001
Tuesday, 12 June 2001
- RE: Moving DASL to Experimental
- RE: Proposal for marshalling property type information
- RE: Proposal for marshalling property type information
- Oracle IFS vs. Microsoft Webfolders
- Re: Moving DASL to Experimental
Friday, 8 June 2001
- Re: about source code of DAV4J
- about source code of DAV4J
- RE: WebDAV FAQ started
- Re: WebDAV FAQ started
- RE: Proposal for marshalling property type information
- RE: WebDAV FAQ started
- WebDAV FAQ started
Wednesday, 6 June 2001
Tuesday, 5 June 2001
- IETF-51,London, UK, August 5-10
- RE: Logic for extending text XML elements
- RE: Logic for extending text XML elements
- RE: Logic for extending text XML elements
- RE: Logic for extending text XML elements
- Logic for extending text XML elements
Monday, 4 June 2001
Tuesday, 29 May 2001
Sunday, 27 May 2001
Saturday, 26 May 2001
Friday, 25 May 2001
- RE: RDF and DAV properties
- RDF and DAV properties
- FW: Returned mail: Remote protocol error
- RE: Why not an encapsulation for DAV over standard HTTP 1.0 or 1.1 without required server extension ?
- RE: Why not an encapsulation for DAV over standard HTTP 1.0 or 1.1 without required server extension ?
- RE: Why not an encapsulation for DAV over standard HTTP 1.0 or 1.1 without required server extension ?
- Re: Why not an encapsulation for DAV over standard HTTP 1.0 or 1.1 without required server extension ?
- RE: Issue: Locking namespaces vs. resources
- Re: Issue: Locking namespaces vs. resources
- Issue: Locking namespaces vs. resources
Thursday, 24 May 2001
Tuesday, 22 May 2001
Monday, 21 May 2001
- Re: Problem with Adobe GoLive 5.0's parsing of PROPFIND
- RE: Problem with Adobe GoLive 5.0's parsing of PROPFIND
- Re: Problem with Adobe GoLive 5.0's parsing of PROPFIND
- RE: Problem with Adobe GoLive 5.0's parsing of PROPFIND
- Re: Problem with Adobe GoLive 5.0's parsing of PROPFIND
- Problem with Adobe GoLive 5.0's parsing of PROPFIND
Tuesday, 15 May 2001
Monday, 14 May 2001
Friday, 11 May 2001
Thursday, 10 May 2001
- Proposal for marshalling property type information
- Re: RFC 2518 ... in French! (Version francaise de RFC 2518)
- RE: Summary: File creation date, version creation date, and getlastmodified
- Pedantic
- Re: Summary: ALLPROP_AND_COMPUTED
- RE: Issue: LIVE_AND_NON_LIVE
Wednesday, 9 May 2001
- Re: Issue: LIVE_AND_NON_LIVE
- RE: Issue: LIVE_AND_NON_LIVE
- RE: Issue: XML_LANG_CLARIFY
- RE: Summary: File creation date, version creation date, and getlastmodified
- Issue: LIVE_AND_NON_LIVE
- RE: Summary: ALLPROP_AND_COMPUTED
- Summary: File creation date, version creation date, and getlastmodified
- RE: Summary: ALLPROP_AND_COMPUTED
- Summary: ALLPROP_AND_COMPUTED
- RE: File creation date, version creation date, and getlastmodified
- RFC 2518 ... in French! (Version française de RFC 2518)
- RE: File creation date, version creation date, and getlastmodified
Monday, 7 May 2001
Sunday, 6 May 2001
- RE: Issue: ALLPROP_AND_COMPUTED
- RE: Issue: ALLPROP_AND_COMPUTED
- RE: Issue: ALLPROP_AND_COMPUTED
- Re: Issue: ALLPROP_AND_COMPUTED
- replicating properties
- RE: Issue: ALLPROP_AND_COMPUTED
Saturday, 5 May 2001
- RE: Issue: ALLPROP_AND_COMPUTED
- RE: Issue: ALLPROP_AND_COMPUTED
- RE: Issue: ALLPROP_AND_COMPUTED
- RE: Issue: ALLPROP_AND_COMPUTED
- Re: Issue: ALLPROP_AND_COMPUTED
- Re: Issue: ALLPROP_AND_COMPUTED
- Re: Issue: ALLPROP_AND_COMPUTED
Friday, 4 May 2001
- RE: Issue: ALLPROP_AND_COMPUTED
- Re: Issue: ALLPROP_AND_COMPUTED
- RE: Issue: ALLPROP_AND_COMPUTED
- RE: IE5 & DAV Interoperability
- Re: Issue: ALLPROP_AND_COMPUTED
- Re: Issue: ALLPROP_AND_COMPUTED
- AW: AW: Issue: ALLPROP_AND_COMPUTED
- Re: AW: Issue: ALLPROP_AND_COMPUTED
- AW: Issue: ALLPROP_AND_COMPUTED
- Re: Issue: ALLPROP_AND_COMPUTED
- What was I thinkin' ? (was: RE: File creation date, version creation date, and getlastmodified)
- AW: Issue: ALLPROP_AND_COMPUTED
- Re: Issue: ALLPROP_AND_COMPUTED
- RE: File creation date, version creation date, and getlastmodifie d
- Re: IE5 & DAV Interoperability
Thursday, 3 May 2001
- RE: File creation date, version creation date, and getlastmodifie d
- RE: File creation date, version creation date, and getlastmodified
- RE: File creation date, version creation date, and getlastmodified
- RE: File creation date, version creation date, and getlastmodified
- RE: File creation date, version creation date, and getlastmodifie d
- RE: File creation date, version creation date, and getlastmodified
- RE: Issue: ALLPROP_AND_COMPUTED
- RE: File creation date, version creation date, and getlastmodified
- Re: File creation date, version creation date, and getlastmodified
- RE: File creation date, version creation date, and getlastmodifie d
- RE: File creation date, version creation date, and getlastmodifie d
- RE: File creation date, version creation date, and getlastmodified
- RE: File creation date, version creation date, and getlastmodifie d
- RE: Issue: ALLPROP_AND_COMPUTED
- RE: File creation date, version creation date, and getlastmodified
Wednesday, 2 May 2001
- Re: IE5 & DAV Interoperability
- RE: [ACL] Reviewing the ACL Spec - Semantics
- IE5 & DAV Interoperability
- RE: File creation date, version creation date, and getlastmodifie d
- RE: File creation date, version creation date, and getlastmodified
- RE: [ACL] Reviewing the ACL Spec - IsPrincipal
- File creation date, version creation date, and getlastmodified
- RE: Issue: ALLPROP_AND_COMPUTED
- Re: Issue: ALLPROP_AND_COMPUTED
Saturday, 28 April 2001
Friday, 27 April 2001
Thursday, 26 April 2001
- Repository in a Box
- RE: Issue: ALLPROP_AND_COMPUTED
- RE: Issue: ALLPROP_AND_COMPUTED
- Re: Issue: ALLPROP_AND_COMPUTED
- Re: Issue: ALLPROP_AND_COMPUTED
- AW: Issue: XML_LANG_CLARIFY
- RE: Issue: XML_LANG_CLARIFY
- AW: Issue: XML_LANG_CLARIFY
- RE: Issue: XML_LANG_CLARIFY
- RE: Issue: ALLPROP_AND_COMPUTED
- AW: Issue: XML_LANG_CLARIFY
- Re: Issue: ALLPROP_AND_COMPUTED
- Re: Issue: XML_LANG_CLARIFY
Wednesday, 25 April 2001
- RE: Issue: XML_LANG_CLARIFY
- RE: Issue: XML_LANG_CLARIFY
- AW: Issue: XML_LANG_CLARIFY
- AW: Issue: XML_LANG_CLARIFY
- Re: Issue: XML_LANG_CLARIFY
- RE: Issue: XML_LANG_CLARIFY
- RE: Issue: XML_LANG_CLARIFY
- RE: Issue: XML_LANG_CLARIFY
- Updated issues list
- RE: Issue: ALLPROP_AND_COMPUTED
- Issue: XML_LANG_CLARIFY
- Issue: ALLPROP_AND_COMPUTED
- Resolved: NEED_FOR_PUTL
- Resolved: OPTION_WITH_DEPTH
Monday, 23 April 2001
- FW: RE: Issue: NEED_FOR_PUTL
- Re: [w3c-dist-auth] <none>
- [w3c-dist-auth] <none>
- [w3c-dist-auth] <none>
Sunday, 22 April 2001
- AW: Issue: PROP_ATTR
- RE: Issue: BIND and MKRESOURCE
- RE: Issue: BIND and MKRESOURCE
- RE: Issue: BIND and MKRESOURCE
- RE: Issue: BIND and MKRESOURCE
Saturday, 21 April 2001
- RE: Issue: BIND and MKRESOURCE
- RE: Issue: OPTION_WITH_DEPTH
- RE: Issue: NEED_FOR_PUTL
- Re: Issue: NEED_FOR_PUTL
- Re: Issue: OPTION_WITH_DEPTH
Thursday, 19 April 2001
- Issue: BIND and MKRESOURCE
- Copying a file from local computer to the server in visual basic with xml
Wednesday, 18 April 2001
Tuesday, 17 April 2001
- RE: WRITE_DAV_PROP: Summary of consensus
- Re: WRITE_DAV_PROP: Summary of consensus
- RE: Issue: WRITE_DAV_PROP
- Re: When to modify getlastmodified (Was: RE: WRITE_DAV_PROP: Summary of consensus
- Re: WRITE_DAV_PROP: Summary of consensus
Monday, 16 April 2001
- Re: Issue: WRITE_DAV_PROP
- When to modify getlastmodified (Was: RE: WRITE_DAV_PROP: Summary of consensus
- RE: WRITE_DAV_PROP: Summary of consensus
- RE: PROP_ATTR: consensus points
- RE: WRITE_DAV_PROP: Summary of consensus
- RE: WRITE_DAV_PROP: Summary of consensus
- Re: WRITE_DAV_PROP: Summary of consensus
- RE: WRITE_DAV_PROP: Summary of consensus
- RE: WRITE_DAV_PROP: Summary of consensus
- RE: WRITE_DAV_PROP: Summary of consensus
- Re: WRITE_DAV_PROP: Summary of consensus
- RE: Issue: WRITE_DAV_PROP
- WRITE_DAV_PROP: Summary of consensus
- PROP_ATTR: consensus points
- RE: Issue: WRITE_DAV_PROP
- Re: [zodiac@holoweb.net: Re: Issue: PROP_ATTR]
- RE: Issue: PROP_ATTR
- RE: Issue: PROP_ATTR
- RE: Issue: PROP_ATTR
Sunday, 15 April 2001
- RE: Issue: PROP_ATTR
- Re: Issue: PROP_ATTR
- RE: Issue: WRITE_DAV_PROP
- RE: Issue: PROP_ATTR
- Re: Issue: PROP_ATTR
Saturday, 14 April 2001
- Re: Issue: PROP_ATTR
- RE: Issue: PROP_ATTR
- RE: Issue: PROP_ATTR
- RE: Issue: PROP_ATTR
- RE: Issue: PROP_ATTR
- RE: Issue: PROP_ATTR
- RE: [zodiac@holoweb.net: Re: Issue: PROP_ATTR]
- [zodiac@holoweb.net: Re: Issue: PROP_ATTR]
Friday, 13 April 2001
- Re: Issue: WRITE_DAV_PROP
- Re: Issue: PROP_ATTR
- Re: Issue: WRITE_DAV_PROP
- Re: Issue: WRITE_DAV_PROP
- Re: Issue: PROP_ATTR
- RE: Issue: PROP_ATTR
- RE: Issue: PROP_ATTR
- Re: Issue: PROP_ATTR
- RE: Issue: PROP_ATTR
- RE: Issue: PROP_ATTR
- RE: Issue: PROP_ATTR
- RE: Issue: PROP_ATTR
- RE: Issue: WRITE_DAV_PROP
Thursday, 12 April 2001
Wednesday, 11 April 2001
- deltaV (draft 14) questions
- Issue: PROP_ATTR
- RE: Issue: PROP_ATTR
- RE: Issue: PROP_ATTR
- RE: Issue: WRITE_DAV_PROP
- RE: Issue: PROP_ATTR
- RE: Issue: WRITE_DAV_PROP
- RE: Issue: PROP_ATTR
- Re: Issue: PROP_ATTR
- Re: Issue: PROP_ATTR
- RE: Issue: PROP_ATTR
- RE: Issue: PROP_ATTR
- Re: [offlist] WebDAV Delete post (Flavors of DELETE)
- Re: [offlist] WebDAV Delete post (Flavors of DELETE)
- RE: Issue: PROP_ATTR
- Issue: WRITE_DAV_PROP
- Issue: PROP_ATTR
- Four-part process for moving to Draft
Tuesday, 10 April 2001
- RE: [offlist] WebDAV Delete post (Flavors of DELETE)
- RE: [offlist] WebDAV Delete post (Flavors of DELETE)
- Re: [offlist] WebDAV Delete post (Flavors of DELETE)
- RE: [offlist] WebDAV Delete post (Flavors of DELETE)
- Re: [offlist] WebDAV Delete post (Flavors of DELETE)
- Moving RFC 2518 to Draft Standard
- XML version of RFC 2518, Adv. Collection drafts
- Moving DASL to Experimental
- Re: [offlist] WebDAV Delete post (Flavors of DELETE)
- RE: [offlist] WebDAV Delete post (Flavors of DELETE)
- RE: [offlist] WebDAV Delete post (Flavors of DELETE)
- RE: [offlist] WebDAV Delete post (Flavors of DELETE)
- RE: [offlist] WebDAV Delete post (Flavors of DELETE)
- Re: [offlist] WebDAV Delete post (Flavors of DELETE)
- Minneapolis IETF minutes (preliminary)