- From: Eric Sedlar <Eric.Sedlar@oracle.com>
- Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2001 22:58:21 -0700
- To: "WebDAV WG" <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
I agree. There is no reason not to persist attributes. > -----Original Message----- > From: w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org > [mailto:w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Mark A. Hale > Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2001 6:29 PM > To: WebDAV WG > Subject: RE: Issue: PROP_ATTR > > > Jim: Thanks for getting the issues list started. > > I believe that WebDAV must permit properties to have attributes. > As you've > pointed out, RDF and PRISM do use them extensively. A server can reformat > the attributes in a subsequent PROPFIND request. Attrbiutes should be > persistent. > > Thanks, > > Mark > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org > > [mailto:w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Jim Whitehead > > Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2001 5:54 PM > > To: WebDAV WG > > Subject: Issue: PROP_ATTR > > > > > > As mentioned in a previous post, now is the time to start > resolving issues > > on the RFC 2518 issues list. As fate would have it, the first > > issue on the > > list is one that has been contentious in the past. Can we come to > > consensus > > on it now? > > > > Issue: PROP_ATTR > > > > Description: > > > > What is a WebDAV server required to do with XML attributes other than > > xml:lang submitted with a PROPPATCH? This affects how well > WebDAV will be > > able to support RDF, since RDF uses attributes extensively. > > > > Greg Stein originally raised this issue: > > > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-dist-auth/1998OctDec/0089.html > > > > See also: > > > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-dist-auth/1998OctDec/0092.html > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-dist-auth/1998OctDec/0094.html > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-dist-auth/1998OctDec/0095.html > > > > > > > > > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 11 April 2001 02:04:39 UTC