- From: Harris, Matt <Matt.Harris@Mattel.com>
- Date: Wed, 2 May 2001 15:11:22 -0700
- To: DeltaV <ietf-dav-versioning@w3.org>, w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
- Message-ID: <2ABD012C3FB72A44A0429F4CDAFE767602E470CB@estwr50a.eshq.mattel.com>
I am an implementer, not a developer, but I do have an opinion on this one. For process workflow applications, it is very important to know when the resource is last changed. I care less about property changes, although that event is key for backup software. I would like to see both tracked. As far as versioning is concerned, it will often be important to know both when Check-out occurred and when Check-in occurred, however, getlastmodified should only reflect Check-in. This is because the resource has not been modified, as far as DAV is concerned, until that Check-in has occurred. To keep this consistent with the three properties you listed, getlasttouched would reflect the Check-out event because the file lock was set, while getlastmodified would not. On Checked-in both would be updated. Matt Harris > -----Original Message----- > From: Lisa Dusseault [mailto:lisa@xythos.com] > Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2001 2:25 PM > To: DeltaV; w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > Subject: File creation date, version creation date, and > getlastmodified > > > > WebDAV people: RFC2518 leaves it carefully open whether > 'getlastmodified' > changes when properties of the resource change. It seems > useful either > way -- users might want to get the last time the content was > changed, or > they might want to see the last time the file was touched at > all. Is there > some precedent? Really, one might best be served by a new timestamp > property, so the suite of timestamp-like properties would be > - creationdate > - time the content was last modified (etag changes, but etag doesn't > provide a timestamp) > - time the file was last touched > > Which one of the last two is most commonly handled by getlastmodified? > Implementors speak up? > > DeltaV people: What does it mean to get the time file content was last > "modified", if the file is versioned? I don't see that the > behaviour of > getlastmodified is specified for a Version-Controlled > Resource, can this be > a recommendation in the spec to promote consistency? For one > thing, should > 'getlastmodified' on the VCR change when it is checked out, > or when it is > checked in, or both? > > lisa >
Received on Wednesday, 2 May 2001 18:14:02 UTC