- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Fri, 4 May 2001 15:15:22 +0200
- To: <Tim_Ellison@uk.ibm.com>, <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
> Von: w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org > [mailto:w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org]Im Auftrag von > Tim_Ellison@uk.ibm.com > Gesendet: Freitag, 4. Mai 2001 11:34 > An: Julian Reschke; w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > Betreff: Re: AW: Issue: ALLPROP_AND_COMPUTED > > My point is that if, say, a versioning unaware client uses PROPFIND with > DAV:allprop and retrieves the name and value of the DAV:successor-set > property, the best the client can likely do is to render the XML > value some > way that is not going to be very meaningful; and the client > certainly isn't > going to know how to change that value. Agreed. When I wrote my mail, I was thinking of dead properties.
Received on Friday, 4 May 2001 09:15:55 UTC