- From: Tim Ellison <Tim_Ellison@uk.ibm.com>
- Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 10:24:33 +0100
- To: "WebDAV WG" <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
"Jim Whitehead" <ejw@cse.ucsc.edu> wrote: [snip] lots of stuff we agree on > > Moving the server state of an 'unmapped-URL where the immediate > > parent exists' from no resource to a resource should, IMHO, > > respond with 201 Created. > > This makes sense to me. My concern is that it would still be nice for the > first PUT after a lock-null is created to also return a 201. I don't see why? The resource has already been created and the PUT is simply modifying the existing resource. What is the basis of your concern? Tim
Received on Thursday, 21 June 2001 05:50:48 UTC