- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2001 23:01:23 +0200
- To: "Clemm, Geoff" <gclemm@rational.com>, "WebDAV WG" <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
I don't see any advantage as long as the inheritence rules are clearly specified, such as in <http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xml-c14n-20010315#DocSubsets> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org]Im Auftrag von Clemm, Geoff Gesendet: Mittwoch, 25. April 2001 22:47 An: WebDAV WG Betreff: RE: Issue: XML_LANG_CLARIFY To keep things simple, I would just disallow the xml:lang attribute on the D:prop node. In fact, I would indicate that all attributes on the D:prop node are ignored unless explicitly defined by the protocol as being allowed there. This allows a client to ignore attributes on the D:prop node, and just store all attributes on the property node, without having to understand the inheritance semantics of those attributes. Cheers, Geoff -----Original Message----- From: Jason Crawford [mailto:ccjason@us.ibm.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 3:44 PM To: Clemm, Geoff Cc: WebDAV WG Subject: RE: Issue: XML_LANG_CLARIFY To be persistant, I think we all agree the xml:lang attribute can be on the property node and doesn't have to be on a child. Do we agree that it can even be on the parent of the property node and still be persistant? Should we discourage the client from doing this though? <D:set> <D:prop xml:lang="NL"> <D:displaynname>Kikkers in de koek</D:displayname> </D:prop> </D:set> ------------------------------------------ Phone: 914-784-7569, ccjason@us.ibm.com
Received on Wednesday, 25 April 2001 17:01:39 UTC