W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > April to June 2001


From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2001 23:01:23 +0200
To: "Clemm, Geoff" <gclemm@rational.com>, "WebDAV WG" <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
Message-ID: <JIEGINCHMLABHJBIGKBCKEOACCAA.julian.reschke@gmx.de>
I don't see any advantage as long as the inheritence rules are clearly
specified, such as in


-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org
[mailto:w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org]Im Auftrag von Clemm, Geoff
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 25. April 2001 22:47
Betreff: RE: Issue: XML_LANG_CLARIFY

To keep things simple, I would just disallow the xml:lang attribute
on the D:prop node.  In fact, I would indicate that all attributes
on the D:prop node are ignored unless explicitly defined by the
protocol as being allowed there.

This allows a client to ignore attributes on the D:prop node, and
just store all attributes on the property node, without having to
understand the inheritance semantics of those attributes.


-----Original Message-----
From: Jason Crawford [mailto:ccjason@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 3:44 PM
To: Clemm, Geoff
Subject: RE: Issue: XML_LANG_CLARIFY

To be persistant, I think we all agree the xml:lang attribute can be on the
property node and doesn't have to be on a child.  Do we agree that it can
even be on the parent of the property node and still be persistant?
Should we discourage the client from doing this though?

 <D:prop xml:lang="NL">
   <D:displaynname>Kikkers in de koek</D:displayname>

Phone: 914-784-7569,   ccjason@us.ibm.com
Received on Wednesday, 25 April 2001 17:01:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 20:01:22 UTC