- From: Julian F. Reschke <julian.reschke@greenbytes.de>
- Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2001 12:23:54 +0200
- To: "WebDAV WG" <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
> From: w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org > [mailto:w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Kevin Wiggen > Sent: Friday, April 13, 2001 6:02 PM > To: Greg Stein; WebDAV WG > Subject: RE: Issue: PROP_ATTR > > > > I agree with Greg et all that "attr2" needs to be stored. > > I believe that allowing "attr1" could lead to some interop problems, or we > need to spec this out a little better: > > <D:prop> > <theprop attr1="foo"/> > <theprop attr1="bar"/> > <theprop attr2="fee"/> > </D:prop> > > Is that legal? Does the attribute make the property unique? Does simply No, it doesn't. If the language in section 4.5 (<http://www.greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/rfc2518.html#rfc.section.4.5>) isn't clear enough on that, it should be enhanced. > the value of an attribute make it unique? Or do we (like xmllang) simply > store one set of attributes for a property? Who does? RFC2518 says that xml:lang must be preserved, but it doesn't say that there may be multiple copies of the property with different language values (<http://www.greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/rfc2518.html#ELEMENT_set>). > Also how does one use Dasl with attributes on properties? > > I would like to see attributes on the property name not be supported. I might agree, but not for the reasons given here.
Received on Saturday, 14 April 2001 06:24:14 UTC