public-rif-wg@w3.org from May 2006 by date

Wednesday, 31 May 2006

• RE: RIF: A thought about requirements --> PRR Vincent, Paul D
• Re: RIF: A thought about requirements --> PRR Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: RIF: A thought about requirements --> PRR ewallace@cme.nist.gov
• Re: RIF Telcon Minutes -- 30 May 2006 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: RIF: A thought about requirements --> PRR Bijan Parsia
• Re: RIF Telcon Minutes -- 30 May 2006 Dave Reynolds
• RE: A thought about requirements --> PRR Gerd Wagner
• Re: RIF Telcon Minutes -- 30 May 2006 Hassan Aït-Kaci
• RE: RIF: A thought about requirements --> PRR Vincent, Paul D
• Re: RIF Telcon Minutes -- 30 May 2006 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: RIF: A thought about requirements --> PRR Bijan Parsia

Tuesday, 30 May 2006

• Re: [RIF] New diagram with Goals, CSFs, and Requirements jos.deroo@agfa.com
• Re: [RIF] New diagram with Goals, CSFs, and Requirements Frank McCabe
• RE: [RIF] New diagram with Goals, CSFs, and Requirements Hirtle, David
• RIF Telcon Minutes -- 30 May 2006 Hassan Aït-Kaci
• RIF: A thought about requirements --> PRR Vincent, Paul D
• Re: [RIF] New diagram with Goals, CSFs, and Requirements Dave Reynolds
• Re: [RIF] New diagram with Goals, CSFs, and Requirements: Whatever happened to first-order logic as a requirement? Paula-Lavinia Patranjan
• Re: [RIF] New diagram with Goals, CSFs, and Requirements: Whatever happened to first-order logic as a requirement? Leora Morgenstern
• Re: [RIF] New diagram with Goals, CSFs, and Requirements Christian de Sainte Marie
• Re: [RIF] New diagram with Goals, CSFs, and Requirements Dave Reynolds
• Re: A proposal for a unitary RIF phase 1 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: [RIF] New diagram with Goals, CSFs, and Requirements Paula-Lavinia Patranjan
• Re: A proposal for a unitary RIF phase 1 Michael Kifer
• Re: [ALL] Important: Requirements for RIF - actions for f2f absentees Chris Welty
• Re: A proposal for a unitary RIF phase 1 Chris Welty
• Re: [RIF] New diagram with Goals, CSFs, and Requirements Dave Reynolds
• Re: A proposal for a unitary RIF phase 1 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: A proposal for a unitary RIF phase 1 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: A thought about requirements Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: A proposal for a unitary RIF phase 1 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• [SWC] representational issues in combining rules and ontologies Jos de Bruijn

Monday, 29 May 2006

• Re: A proposal for a unitary RIF phase 1 Chris Welty
• Re: RIF: A thought about requirements Francois Bry
• Re: [RIF] Agenda for telecon 30 May Jeff Z. Pan
• Re: [RIF][Admin] Draft agenda for F2F3, 8-9 June, Budva Paula-Lavinia Patranjan
• Re: [RIF] Current list of requirements and design principles for RIF Francois Bry
• Re: A thought about requirements Chris Welty
• Re: A thought about requirements Bijan Parsia
• Re: A thought about requirements Francis McCabe
• Re: A thought about requirements Bijan Parsia

Sunday, 28 May 2006

• Re: RIF: A thought about requirements Michael Kifer
• RIF: A thought about requirements Vincent, Paul D
• A thought about requirements Francis McCabe
• Re: A proposal for a unitary RIF phase 1 Dan Connolly
• Re: A proposal for a unitary RIF phase 1 Michael Kifer
• Re: A proposal for a unitary RIF phase 1 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: A proposal for a unitary RIF phase 1 Michael Kifer
• Re: A proposal for a unitary RIF phase 1 Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Saturday, 27 May 2006

• Re: A proposal for a unitary RIF phase 1 Michael Kifer
• Re: [RIF] Agenda for telecon 30 May Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• [ALL] upcoming telecon notes Chris Welty
• [RIF] Agenda for telecon 30 May Chris Welty
• [ALL] Important: Requirements for RIF - path forward to second UCR WD Chris Welty
• Re: A proposal for a unitary RIF phase 1 Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Friday, 26 May 2006

• RE: A proposal for a unitary RIF phase 1 Gerd Wagner
• Re: [RIF] New diagram with Goals, CSFs, and Requirements Chris Welty
• Re: [RIF] New diagram with Goals, CSFs, and Requirements Chris Welty
• RE: [RIF] Current list of requirements and design principles for RIF Stan Devitt
• A proposal for a unitary RIF phase 1 Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: [RIF] Current list of requirements and design principles for RIF Sandro Hawke
• Re: [RIF] Current list of requirements and design principles for RIF Francois Bry
• RE: [RIF] Current list of requirements and design principles for RIF Stan Devitt
• [RIF] New diagram with Goals, CSFs, and Requirements Paula-Lavinia Patranjan
• Re: [RIF] Current list of requirements and design principles for RIF Francois Bry

Thursday, 25 May 2006

• [RIF][Admin] Draft minutes from Telecon 2006-05-23 Boley, Harold

Wednesday, 24 May 2006

• [RIF][Admin] Draft agenda for F2F3, 8-9 June, Budva Christian de Sainte Marie
• [ALL] Update on regrets policy Chris Welty
• Editors for Phase I technical spec Chris Welty
• Re: [RIF] Current list of requirements and design principles for RIF Paula-Lavinia Patranjan
• Re: RIFRAF analysis for DLV Axel Polleres
• RE: [RIF] Current list of requirements and design principles for RIF Stan Devitt

Tuesday, 23 May 2006

• RE: RIFRAF analysis for DLV Boley, Harold
• [RIF] Current list of requirements and design principles for RIF Paula-Lavinia Patranjan
• Re: [RIF] A draft of the Minutes from May 9 Phone Call Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RIFRAF analysis of Xcerpt and XChange Paula-Lavinia Patranjan

Monday, 22 May 2006

• [RIF] Agenda for telecon 23 May (REVISED) Christian de Sainte Marie
• [RIF] Agenda for telecon 23 May Christian de Sainte Marie
• Re: [RIF] A draft of the Minutes from May 9 Phone Call Christian de Sainte Marie
• RE: [RIF] Extensible Design / Predicate Typing Gerd Wagner
• [UCR] New use case illustrating XML data Gary Hallmark

Saturday, 20 May 2006

• RE: [RIF] Extensible Design Boley, Harold

Friday, 19 May 2006

• Re: mappings between SWRL and Boley proposal Michael Kifer
• Re: [RIF] Critical Success Factors for Goal 1 Allen Ginsberg
• Re: A requirements diagram Paula-Lavinia Patranjan
• Re: mappings between SWRL and Boley proposal Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: mappings between SWRL and Boley proposal Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: mappings between SWRL and Boley proposal Gerd Wagner
• Re: mappings between SWRL and Boley proposal Michael Kifer
• Re: mappings between SWRL and Boley proposal Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: mappings between SWRL and Boley proposal Michael Kifer

Thursday, 18 May 2006

• Re: mappings between SWRL and Boley proposal Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: mappings between SWRL and Boley proposal Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: mappings between SWRL and Boley proposal Hassan Aït-Kaci
• Re: mappings between SWRL and Boley proposal Michael Kifer
• Re: mappings between SWRL and Boley proposal Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: mappings between SWRL and Boley proposal Michael Kifer
• Re: [RIF] Critical Success Factors for Goal 1 ewallace@cme.nist.gov
• [RIF] Critical Success Factors for Goal 1 Ginsberg, Allen
• Re: RIF: soundness and semantics --> functional requirements? ewallace@cme.nist.gov
• RE: mappings between SWRL and Boley proposal Gerd Wagner
• Re: soundness and semantics Paula-Lavinia Patranjan
• Re: RIF: soundness and semantics --> functional requirements? Francois Bry
• RE: RIF: soundness and semantics --> functional requirements? Vincent, Paul D
• Re: RIF: soundness and semantics --> functional requirements? Paula-Lavinia Patranjan
• RIF: soundness and semantics --> functional requirements? Vincent, Paul D
• Re: soundness and semantics Francois Bry

Wednesday, 17 May 2006

• Re: A requirements diagram ewallace@cme.nist.gov
• Re: soundness and semantics ewallace@cme.nist.gov
• RIFRAF analysis for WRL Axel Polleres
• RIFRAF analysis for DLV Axel Polleres
• Re: mappings between SWRL and Boley proposal Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: mappings between SWRL and Boley proposal Gerd Wagner
• Re: A requirements diagram Dave Reynolds
• Re: XML Data -was- RE: [UCR] Public Comment clarification of term use Dave Reynolds
• Re: mappings between SWRL and Boley proposal Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: mappings between SWRL and Boley proposal Gerd Wagner
• Re: XML Data -was- RE: [UCR] Public Comment clarification of term use Bijan Parsia
• Re: XML Data -was- RE: [UCR] Public Comment clarification of term use Christian de Sainte Marie
• A requirements diagram Francis McCabe

Tuesday, 16 May 2006

• mappings between SWRL and Boley proposal Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: XML Data -was- RE: [UCR] Public Comment clarification of term use Vincent, Paul D
• [Admin] Draft minutes from Telecon 2006-05-16 Dave Reynolds
• RE: [RIF] Evaluation of RIRAF for IRL and LIFE Boley, Harold
• Formal Concept Analysis and conceptual lattice drawing Hassan Aït-Kaci
• XML Data -was- RE: [UCR] Public Comment clarification of term use ewallace@cme.nist.gov
• Re: [RIF] Extensible Design Axel Polleres
• RIFRAF and language taxonomy Michael Kifer
• [RIF] Evaluation of RIRAF for IRL and LIFE Hassan Aït-Kaci

Monday, 15 May 2006

• RE: [UCR] Public Comment clarification of term use Hirtle, David
• [RIF] Agenda for 16 May telecon Christian de Sainte Marie

Friday, 12 May 2006

• Re: [RIF] A draft of the Minutes from May 9 Phone Call Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: [RIF] Reaction to the proposal by Boley, Kifer et al Hassan Aït-Kaci
• Re: [RIF] A draft of the Minutes from May 9 Phone Call Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: [RIF] Reaction to the proposal by Boley, Kifer et al Francois Bry
• RE: [RIF] A draft of the Minutes from May 9 Phone Call Stan Devitt

Thursday, 11 May 2006

• Re: [RIF] A draft of the Minutes from May 9 Phone Call Sandro Hawke
• Re: [RIF] A draft of the Minutes from May 9 Phone Call Chris Welty
• Re: soundness and semantics Francois Bry
• Re: soundness for RIF Francois Bry
• Re: [RIF] A draft of the Minutes from May 9 Phone Call Sandro Hawke
• [RIF] A draft of the Minutes from May 9 Phone Call Stan Devitt
• RE: soundness and semantics Stan Devitt
• Re: soundness and semantics Sandro Hawke
• Re: soundness for RIF Bijan Parsia
• soundness and semantics Francois Bry
• RE: [UCR] Public Comment clarification of term use Vincent, Paul D
• Re: [UCR] Public Comment clarification of term use Francois Bry
• Re: soundness for RIF Michael Kifer
• Re: soundness for RIF Sandro Hawke
• Re: soundness for RIF Michael Kifer
• Re: soundness for RIF Sandro Hawke
• RE: [UCR] Public Comment clarification of term use Ginsberg, Allen
• Re: soundness for RIF Chris Welty

Wednesday, 10 May 2006

• Re: [UCR] Review from Sven Groppe Sandro Hawke
• [UCR] Public Comment clarification of term use Christopher Welty
• Re: [UCR] Review from Sven Groppe Dan Connolly
• [UCR] Review from SPARQL WG Christopher Welty
• [ALL] Re: Rules, and XBRL Christopher Welty
• Re: soundness for RIF Francois Bry
• Re: instead of "Pure Prolog" (H-Prolog and SH-Prolog ?) Francois Bry
• F2F3 - Confirmation of room reservation Paula-Lavinia Patranjan

Tuesday, 9 May 2006

• Re: instead of "Pure Prolog" (H-Prolog and SH-Prolog ?) jos.deroo@agfa.com
• Re: [RIF] Goals and Critical Success Factors as they relate to first-order logic Leora Morgenstern
• Re: instead of "Pure Prolog" (H-Prolog and SH-Prolog ?) Sandro Hawke
• Re: instead of "Pure Prolog" Sandro Hawke
• Re: soundness for RIF Sandro Hawke
• Re: soundness for RIF Sandro Hawke
• [ALL] RIF discussion for next week Christopher Welty
• Re: [RIF] Goals and Critical Success Factors as they relate to first-order logic Paula-Lavinia Patranjan
• [RIF] Goals and Critical Success Factors as they relate to first-order logic Leora Morgenstern
• [RIF] Proposal for vanilla first-order logic Leora Morgenstern
• Re: "Semantics" vs. "No Semantics" Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: "Semantics" vs. "No Semantics" Francois Bry
• RE: "Semantics" vs. "No Semantics" Obrst, Leo J.
• Re: "Semantics" vs. "No Semantics" Francois Bry
• Re: "Semantics" vs. "No Semantics" Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: "Semantics" vs. "No Semantics" Bijan Parsia
• Re: "Semantics" vs. "No Semantics" Francois Bry
• Re: "Semantics" vs. "No Semantics" Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: "Semantics" vs. "No Semantics" jos.deroo@agfa.com
• Re: "Semantics" vs. "No Semantics" Francois Bry
• Re: "Semantics" vs. "No Semantics" Francois Bry
• Re: soundness for RIF Francois Bry
• Re: instead of "Pure Prolog" Francois Bry
• Re: soundness for RIF Francois Bry
• Re: instead of "Pure Prolog" Dave Reynolds
• Re: "Semantics" vs. "No Semantics" Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: "Semantics" vs. "No Semantics" Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Monday, 8 May 2006

• Re: "Semantics" vs. "No Semantics" jos.deroo@agfa.com
• instead of "Pure Prolog" Sandro Hawke
• RE: "Semantics" vs. "No Semantics" Gerd Wagner
• Re: "Semantics" vs. "No Semantics" Hassan Aït-Kaci
• RE: "Semantics" vs. "No Semantics" Obrst, Leo J.
• Re: "Semantics" vs. "No Semantics" Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: "Semantics" vs. "No Semantics" jos.deroo@agfa.com
• soundness for RIF Sandro Hawke
• Re: "Semantics" vs. "No Semantics" Gary Hallmark
• [RIF] Agenda 9 May RIF Telecon Chris Welty
• Re: "Semantics" vs. "No Semantics" Chris Welty
• Re: [RIF] Extensible Design Francois Bry
• Re: "Semantics" vs. "No Semantics" Francois Bry
• Re: "Semantics" vs. "No Semantics" Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: [RIF]: "Semantics" vs. "No Semantics" Francois Bry
• RE: [RIF]: "Semantics" vs. "No Semantics" Gerd Wagner
• Re: [RIF]: "Semantics" vs. "No Semantics" Francois Bry
• [RIF]: "Semantics" vs. "No Semantics" Vincent, Paul D
• "Semantics" vs. "No Semantics" Francois Bry
• Re: [RIF] Reaction to the proposal by Boley, Kifer et al Francois Bry

Friday, 5 May 2006

• Re: [RIF] Extensible Design Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: [RIF] Reaction to the proposal by Boley, Kifer et al Hassan Aït-Kaci
• RE: [RIF] Extensible Design Gerd Wagner
• Re: [RIF] Reaction to the proposal by Boley, Kifer et al Michael Kifer
• Re: Semantics without variable maps Chris Welty
• Re: [RIF] Extensible Design Dave Reynolds
• Re: [RIF] Extensible Design Frank McCabe
• Re: [RIF] Extensible Design Dave Reynolds
• RE: [RIF] Extensible Design Bijan Parsia
• RE: [RIF] Extensible Design Stan Devitt
• RE: [RIF] Extensible Design Gerd Wagner
• Re: Semantics without variable maps Francois Bry
• Re: [RIF] Extensible Design Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: [RIF] Extensible Design Dave Reynolds
• Re: [RIF] Extensible Design Francois Bry
• Re: [RIF] Extensible Design Francois Bry
• RE: [RIF] Extensible Design Gerd Wagner
• Re: [RIF] Extensible Design --> RIF semantics Francois Bry
• Re: [RIF] Extensible Design Dave Reynolds
• Re: [RIF] Reaction to the proposal by Boley, Kifer et al Francois Bry
• RE: [RIF] Extensible Design Gerd Wagner
• RE: [RIF] Extensible Design Stan Devitt
• RE: [RIF] Agenda 2 May RIF Telecon Stan Devitt

Thursday, 4 May 2006

• Re: [RIF] Extensible Design Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: [RIF] Extensible Design Gerd Wagner
• Re: [RIF] Extensible Design Michael Kifer
• Semantics without variable maps Chris Menzel
• Re: [RIF] Extensible Design Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: [RIF] Extensible Design Michael Kifer
• Re: [RIF] Extensible Design Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: [RIF] Extensible Design Sandro Hawke
• Re: [RIF] Extensible Design Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: [RIF] Extensible Design Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: [RIF] Extensible Design Hassan Aït-Kaci
• RE: [RIF] Extensible Design --> RIF semantics Vincent, Paul D
• Re: [RIF] Extensible Design Frank McCabe
• Re: [RIF] Extensible Design --> RIF semantics Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: [RIF] Extensible Design Michael Kifer
• RE: [RIF] Extensible Design --> RIF semantics Vincent, Paul D
• Re: [RIF] Reaction to the proposal by Boley, Kifer et al Michael Kifer
• Re: [RIF] Extensible Design Francois Bry
• Re: [RIF] Reaction to the proposal by Boley, Kifer et al Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: [RIF] Extensible Design Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: [RIF] Reaction to the proposal by Boley, Kifer et al Uli Sattler
• Re: [RIF] Reaction to the proposal by Boley, Kifer et al Francois Bry
• Re: [RIF] Agenda 2 May RIF Telecon Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: [RIF] Extensible Design Hassan Aït-Kaci
• Re: [RIF] Reaction to the proposal by Boley, Kifer et al Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: [RIF] Reaction to the proposal by Boley, Kifer et al Michael Kifer
• Re: [RIF] Reaction to the proposal by Boley, Kifer et al Francois Bry
• Re: [RIF] Reaction to the proposal by Boley, Kifer et al Francois Bry
• Re: [RIF] Reaction to the proposal by Boley, Kifer et al Francois Bry
• Re: [RIF] Agenda 2 May RIF Telecon Francois Bry
• Re: [RIF] Reaction to the proposal by Boley, Kifer et al Francois Bry
• Re: [RIF] Reaction to the proposal by Boley, Kifer et al Michael Kifer
• Re: [RIF] Reaction to the proposal by Boley, Kifer et al Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Wednesday, 3 May 2006

• RE: [RIF] Reaction to the proposal by Boley, Kifer et al Alex Kozlenkov
• RE: [RIF] Reaction to the proposal by Boley, Kifer et al Vincent, Paul D
• RE: [RIF] Reaction to the proposal by Boley, Kifer et al --> ECA vs PR Vincent, Paul D
• Re: [RIF] Reaction to the proposal by Boley, Kifer et al Michael Kifer
• RE: [RIF] Reaction to the proposal by Boley, Kifer et al --> ECA vs PR Gerd Wagner
• Re: [RIF] Reaction to the proposal by Boley, Kifer et al Gary Hallmark
• RE: [RIF] Reaction to the proposal by Boley, Kifer et al --> ECA vs PR Vincent, Paul D
• Re: [RIF] Reaction to the proposal by Boley, Kifer et al Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: [RIF] Reaction to the proposal by Boley, Kifer et al Hassan Aït-Kaci
• Re: [RIF] Reaction to the proposal by Boley, Kifer et al Dave Reynolds
• RE: [RIF] Reaction to the proposal by Boley, Kifer et al Alex Kozlenkov
• Re: [RIF] Reaction to the proposal by Boley, Kifer et al Michael Kifer
• Re: [RIF] Reaction to the proposal by Boley, Kifer et al Uli Sattler
• Re: [RIF] Reaction to the proposal by Boley, Kifer et al Dave Reynolds
• Re: [RIF] Reaction to the proposal by Boley, Kifer et al Michael Kifer
• RE: [RIF] Reaction to the proposal by Boley, Kifer et al Alex Kozlenkov
• Re: [RIF] Reaction to the proposal by Boley, Kifer et al Michael Kifer
• Re: [RIF] Agenda 2 May RIF Telecon Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Interesting side event at ESWC 2006 Axel Polleres
• Re: [RIF] Reaction to the proposal by Boley, Kifer et al Dave Reynolds
• RE: [RIF] Reaction to the proposal by Boley, Kifer et al Gerd Wagner
• Re: [RIF] Reaction to the proposal by Boley, Kifer et al Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: [RIF] Reaction to the proposal by Boley, Kifer et al Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: [RIF] Reaction to the proposal by Boley, Kifer et al Gerd Wagner
• Re: [RIF] Reaction to the proposal by Boley, Kifer et al Francois Bry
• RE: [RIF] Reaction to the proposal by Boley, Kifer et al Alex Kozlenkov
• Re: [RIF] Reaction to the proposal by Boley, Kifer et al Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• RE: [RIF] Reaction to the proposal by Boley, Kifer et al Alex Kozlenkov
• Re: [RIF] Reaction to the proposal by Boley, Kifer et al Michael Kifer

Tuesday, 2 May 2006

• Draft W3C RIF WG minutes 2006-05-02 Mike Dean
• Re: RIF Homework for May 2 Telecon Michael Kifer
• Re: [UCR] Proposal for RIF' design constraints hierarchy Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: [RIF] Reaction to the proposal by Boley, Kifer et al Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: [UCR] Proposal for RIF' design constraints hierarchy Paula-Lavinia Patranjan
• Re: [UCR] Proposal for RIF' design constraints hierarchy Dave Reynolds
• F2F3 reminder: Information for the local transportation needed by May 3 Paula-Lavinia Patranjan
• [RIF] Reaction to the proposal by Boley, Kifer et al Paula-Lavinia Patranjan
• Re: RIF Homework for May 2 Telecon Paula-Lavinia Patranjan
• Re: [RIF] Agenda 2 May RIF Telecon Mala Mehrotra
• Re: RIF Homework for May 2 Telecon Michael Kifer
• Re: RIF Homework for May 2 Telecon Chris Welty
• [RIF] Agenda 2 May RIF Telecon Chris Welty

Monday, 1 May 2006

• Last CfP: Applications of Logic Programming in the Semantic Web and Semantic Web Services (ALPSWS2006) Axel Polleres

Last message date: Wednesday, 31 May 2006 16:45:17 UTC