- From: Hassan Aït-Kaci <hak@ilog.com>
- Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 12:14:50 -0700
- To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@inf.unibz.it>
- CC: kifer@cs.sunysb.edu, wagnerg@tu-cottbus.de, public-rif-wg@w3.org
Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > I had in mind, in part, trying to explicate what I felt was missing from > the proposal and what was wrong with it. Peter, This is a commendable endeavor. Why, then, won't you try to be more constructive and less rhetorical? We all agree that the proposal is a sketch and must be amended. You seem to have some precise ideas about making it better. So why don't you contribute to it rather than take the stance of decrying it as a whole as a matter of principle? If you think that something in it is wrong, missing, or needs to be made clearer and more precise, it would benefit us all and this WG's objective to see you do so simply and constructively. If it is this proposal that you reject as a whole, then why don't you please make a counter proposal and enlighten the rest of us with what you see as a viable alternative. No offense, but the way you have acted on this issue thus far seems to me a tad childish and puzzles me. But perhaps it's just me feeling so ... -hak -- Hassan Aït-Kaci ILOG, Inc. - Product Division R&D tel/fax: +1 (604) 930-5603 - email: hak @ ilog . com
Received on Thursday, 18 May 2006 19:15:09 UTC