- From: Leora Morgenstern <leora@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 11:25:16 -0400
- To: public-rif-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OF8EEB8657.1F0D5F45-ON85257169.00547CA8-85257169.0054B4EF@us.ibm.com>
I just realized that Widespread Adoption is already listed as a goal. Thus, that shouldn't be listed as a new goal below. I am still suggesting that the FOL requirement be listed under two separate critical success factors, and two separate goals. Regards, Leora Leora Morgenstern/Watson/IBM@IBMUS Sent by: public-rif-wg-request@w3.org 05/09/2006 10:58 AM To public-rif-wg@w3.org cc Subject [RIF] Goals and Critical Success Factors as they relate to first-order logic In response to my second action overdue from last week, I am proposing that the requirement that the RIF must be at least as expressive as first-order logic can be categorized under the following goals and critical success factors: Goal (existing): Level of expressiveness CSF 3 (new): The RIF should be able to express standard Boolean operators as well as classic existential and universal quantification. Requirement: First-order logic Goal (new): The RIF should gain widespread acceptance throughout the industrial, research, and academic communities. CSF1 (new): The RIF should be able to communicate in an important lingua franca of these communities. Requirement: First-order logic Is it all right to have a single requirement be under different goals and critical success factors? Best regards, Leora Morgenstern
Received on Tuesday, 9 May 2006 20:55:52 UTC