- From: Leora Morgenstern <leora@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 11:25:16 -0400
- To: public-rif-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OF8EEB8657.1F0D5F45-ON85257169.00547CA8-85257169.0054B4EF@us.ibm.com>
I just realized that Widespread Adoption is already listed as a goal.
Thus, that shouldn't be listed as a new goal below.
I am still suggesting that the FOL requirement be listed under two
separate critical success factors, and two separate goals.
Regards,
Leora
Leora Morgenstern/Watson/IBM@IBMUS
Sent by: public-rif-wg-request@w3.org
05/09/2006 10:58 AM
To
public-rif-wg@w3.org
cc
Subject
[RIF] Goals and Critical Success Factors as they relate to first-order
logic
In response to my second action overdue from last week, I am proposing
that the requirement that the RIF must be at least as expressive as
first-order logic can be categorized under the following goals and
critical success factors:
Goal (existing): Level of expressiveness
CSF 3 (new): The RIF should be able to express standard Boolean
operators as well as classic existential and universal quantification.
Requirement: First-order logic
Goal (new): The RIF should gain widespread acceptance throughout the
industrial, research, and academic communities.
CSF1 (new): The RIF should be able to communicate in an important
lingua franca of these communities.
Requirement: First-order logic
Is it all right to have a single requirement be under different goals and
critical success factors?
Best regards,
Leora Morgenstern
Received on Tuesday, 9 May 2006 20:55:52 UTC