- From: Vincent, Paul D <PaulVincent@fairisaac.com>
- Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 09:30:25 -0700
- To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfps@inf.unibz.it>
- Cc: <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
Peter - LOL! Actually, the email rights are not stated as belonging to Fair Isaac, just that the content is proprietary and confidential. The only other body mentioned is the recipient, public-rif-wg@w3.org, so possibly it belongs to that! Cheers, Paul Vincent for Fair Isaac > -----Original Message----- > From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider [mailto:pfps@inf.unibz.it] > Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 5:11 PM > To: Vincent, Paul D > Cc: bry@ifi.lmu.de; public-rif-wg@w3.org > Subject: Re: [RIF] Extensible Design --> RIF semantics > > Is Fair Isaac actually asserting such strong property rights over this > message? If so, perhaps W3C should take it off their web site. > > peter > > > > From: "Vincent, Paul D" <PaulVincent@fairisaac.com> > Subject: RE: [RIF] Extensible Design --> RIF semantics > Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 08:43:29 -0700 > > > > > Francois - I interpret this as: > > - the rules being interchanged have semantics > > - the actual interchange mechanism itself does not. > > > > This is presumably a problem for those who identify RIF itself as a > future > > semantic web rule language, rather than an interchange mechanism for > > whatever that language turns out to be. > > > > Or am I missing something here? > > > > Cheers, > > Paul Vincent for Fair Isaac > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: public-rif-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-rif-wg- > request@w3.org] > > > On Behalf Of Francois Bry > > > Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 3:24 PM > > > To: W3C RIF WG > > > Subject: Re: [RIF] Extensible Design > > > > > > > > > Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > > > >>> That there is no formal role for semantics in the RIF - it is just > an > > > >>> interchange syntax. > > > >>> > > > > > > If I understand well, the above statement aims at provoking reactions. > > > (I apologize, if I am wrong!) > > > > > > Are there in this WG members thinking the RIF should habve no > semantics? > > > > > > François > > > > This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential, > proprietary > > and intended solely for the individual or entity to whom they are > > addressed. > > If you have received this email in error please delete it immediately. This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential, proprietary and intended solely for the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please delete it immediately.
Received on Thursday, 4 May 2006 16:31:32 UTC