- From: Gerd Wagner <wagnerg@tu-cottbus.de>
- Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 22:50:01 +0200
- To: "'Dave Reynolds'" <der@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
> However, making the domain/range be a non-literal rdfs:Class > doesn't really impose any restriction. It does, whenever most of your classes are disjoint, which is typically the case in any real world ontology. > Less clearly, the object can be a URIreference without > an error. But only if this URIref is not also an instance of some class. > Further, if the value is a typed value but for an unknown > type then there is no error because there is nothing to > prevent the value for my datatype, that you haven't heard > of, from overlaping with xsd:int. The > open world assumption applies to datatypes as well. OK, but that doesn't seem to be the typical case to me. -Gerd
Received on Friday, 5 May 2006 20:50:01 UTC