- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@inf.unibz.it>
- Date: Sun, 28 May 2006 03:12:50 -0400 (EDT)
- To: kifer@cs.sunysb.edu
- Cc: public-rif-wg@w3.org
From: Michael Kifer <kifer@cs.sunysb.edu> Subject: Re: A proposal for a unitary RIF phase 1 Date: Sat, 27 May 2006 19:34:17 -0400 > Peter, > > It is no big deal to be unitary by restricting the language to Datalog. > You don't even need to limit it to a function-free sublanguage. In our > roadmap the language was unitary also up to this point. OK. > The issue is how to build such a system in an extensible way so that it > could be extended to satisfy most of the RIF requirements. Well, this is at least one of issues. However, I don't see any particular preference for divergent semantics here. > --michael Peter F. Patel-Schneider
Received on Sunday, 28 May 2006 07:13:06 UTC