Re: [RIF] Extensible Design

Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
>>> That there is no formal role for semantics in the RIF - it is just an
>>> interchange syntax.
>>>       

If I understand well, the above statement aims at provoking reactions.
(I apologize, if I am wrong!)

Are there in this WG members thinking the RIF should habve no semantics?

François

Received on Thursday, 4 May 2006 14:24:26 UTC