- From: Francois Bry <bry@ifi.lmu.de>
- Date: Fri, 05 May 2006 11:00:59 +0200
- To: public-rif-wg@w3.org
Michael Kifer wrote: >> Do you really mean this, i.e., that there is essentially only one domain of >> discourse? Are there no possibilities of non-trivial identity, for example >> between f(a) and f(b)? >> > > With equality the domain of interpretation is a set of equivalence classes > over the Herbrand universe. Herbrand universe != Herbrand domain in case > there is equality. This is all standard stuff in Logic Programming. > http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/context/6262/0 > Also see the classical Chang & Lee's book: > > @book{ chang-lee, > author = "C.L. Chang and R.C.T. Lee", > title = "Symbolic Logic and Mechanical Theorem Proving", > publisher = "Academic Press", > year = 1973 > } > > To the beat of my understanding, things can be a little bit more differentiated. There are two approaches to equality in logic programmi9ng and rule languages. - the simple and limited treatment of equality as "syntactical equality". In this case, f(a) != f(b) and the (in)equality between expressions containing variables is only allowed if these variables are bound when this expression is evaluated. - the more complicated one: what Michael has mentioned above. This approach is a full treatment of equality at the cost of a significantly more complicated reasoning procedure (cf. "paramodulatrion"). Many rule languages, especially Prolog and most PR and RR languages, have only equality of the first kind. Francois
Received on Friday, 5 May 2006 09:01:10 UTC