Re: RIF: A thought about requirements

"Vincent, Paul D" <PaulVincent@fairisaac.com> wrote:
>
> It was my understanding that RIF phase 1 was more of an "academic"
> exercise (without PRR), but subsequent phases would address PRR. 

Exactly!

Datalog is no more than a toy. This is why I kept emphasising planning for
Ph 2, which is supposed to integrate PR, CWA, and active rules.


	--michael  

Received on Sunday, 28 May 2006 18:45:42 UTC