RE: [UCR] Public Comment clarification of term use

Hi Chris, 

This is a nice application.

If I understand it correctly it seems to me that it would require the
RIF to handle rules that can match XML data (i.e., XSL
transformations).  

I seem to recall someone suggesting that as a requirement, and also
that 
at least one of the original use-cases (a REWERSE one I think) had
rules
that worked on XML data. 

So unless I am missing something (which might very well be the case) I
would
say that the features of this use-case are already covered.  

That being said, I, for one, would have no problem with it's being
added (using
the original template) to a list of use-cases for the RIF on an
appropriate WIKI page.

Allen



-----Original Message-----
From: public-rif-wg-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-rif-wg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Christopher Welty
Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 10:53 AM
To: public-rif-wg@w3.org
Subject: [UCR] Public Comment clarification of term use


Allen & David,

This was posted on the public comments site.  Seems like an interesting

use case, very webby, and could be viewed as driving an interchange
with 
XSL or something.  Comments?

-Chris


From: Al Gilman <Alfred.S.Gilman@IEEE.org> 
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 16:13:31 -0500
Message-Id: <p06110404c04734aafc61@[10.0.1.2]> 
To: public-rif-comments@w3.org 

Comment on

RIF Use Cases and Requirement
http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/ucr/draft-20060323

In the WAI we have long struggled with how web media could better serve

those
with disbilities that interfere with reading.

http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/usage/languageUsageAndAccess.html

At the moment I am focused on a narrower objective -- isolating best 
practice techniques
for meeting Success Criterion 3.1.3 of WCAG 2.0 (Work in Progress)

http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/WD-UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20-20060317/Overvi
ew.html#meaning-idioms


One general plan for how to clarify these things is to have some sort
of a gloss or 'interpretation sheet' with interpretation rules. I say
'rules' because one doesn't want to mark all occurrences of a
clarified term, but would prefer to isolate them with some sort of a
selector expression.

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/wai-xtech/2004Aug/0007.html

A rough hack at a rule format for this would be an XSL fragment that
matches some pattern of markup such as

<span class="term oed:refuse_1">refuse</span>

and has a right-hand side that injects some RDF/A with SKOS terms to
the effect that when the oed:refuse_1 token is present in the bag of
class tokens, one should interpret the term as defined in

http://www.askoxford.com/concise_oed/refuse_1

This has the right sort of functionality, but it lacks your expertise
in the range of rule languages and the best way to fit into a
community of interoperable rule utterances.

Would the RIF WG consider that this is a use case which is
under-served at present and should be included in the RIF Use Case
collection?

Or if you believe that there is stable prior art that works the
problem well, what would you suggest that is?

Al

Dr. Christopher A. Welty, Knowledge Structures Group
IBM Watson Research Center, 19 Skyline Dr., Hawthorne, NY  10532
Voice: +1 914.784.7055,  IBM T/L: 863.7055, Fax: +1 914.784.7455
Email: welty@watson.ibm.com
Web: http://www.research.ibm.com/people/w/welty/

Received on Thursday, 11 May 2006 01:29:29 UTC