Call for Exclusions: RDFa Core 1.1, XHTML+RDFa 1.1
In case you have not seen...
problem in "CURIE" XML Schema datatype definition
- Re: problem in "CURIE" XML Schema datatype definition
rdf interfaces
Official Response to ISSUE-125 from RDF Web Apps WG
Official Response to ISSUE-124 from RDF Web Apps WG
Official Response to ISSUE-123 from RDF Web Apps WG
Official Response to ISSUE-122 from RDF Web Apps WG
Official Response to ISSUE-121 from RDF Web Apps WG
Official Response to ISSUE-117 from RDF Web Apps WG
Official Response to ISSUE-115 from RDF Web Apps WG
Official Response to ISSUE-114 from RDF Web Apps WG
Official Response to ISSUE-108 from RDF Web Apps WG
Official Response to ISSUE-94 from RDF Web Apps WG
Official Response to ISSUE-90 from RDF Web Apps WG
Official Response to ISSUE-84 from RDF Web Apps WG
Review of XHTML+RDFa 1.1
Another minor issue on RDFa Lite?
comment on the RDFa Core review comments
Telecon Agenda - January 26th 2012, 1500 UTC
XHTML+RDFa 1.1 Ready for Last Call discussion
RDFa Core 1.1 Ready for Last Call discussion
The 'http' prefix issue
A real problem with CURIEs and a proposal
Fwd: IRI types and URI types
RDFa Lite 1.1 - ready for Last Call
My review of RDFa Core 1.1 (2011-12-15 version)
ISSUE-126 (HTML5+RDFa conformance): Can use of xmlns: be reported as an error for HTML5+RDFa 1.1? [RDFa 1.1 in HTML5]
Review of RDFa Core 1.1 (Dec. 15th 2011)
Fwd: Review RDFa LC Primer & Lite documents
- Fwd: Review RDFa LC Primer & Lite documents: relevant to ISSUE-119 (@resource in RDFa Lite instead of @about)
- Re: Fwd: Review RDFa LC Primer & Lite documents
- Re: Review RDFa LC Primer & Lite documents
Comment from RDF WG on CURIE Alignment with SPARQL and Turtle
Telecon Agenda - January 19th 2012, 1500 UTC
ISSUE-125 (Refine CURIE syntax): Should CURIEs be more limited to not trigger on things like http://example.com? [RDFa 1.1 Core]
ACTION-108: RDFa Lite 1.1 Comments
WG comments on RDFa Lite 1.1 for LC publishing, second version (ACTION-106)
Some comments on the timing/planning
Oops… I may have reviewed the wrong document... (ACTION-106)
WG comments on RDFa Lite 1.1 for LC publishing (ACTION-106)
WG comments on XHTML+RDFa for LC publishing (ACTION-111)
General LC review comment/question: scope of the general initial context /2011/rdfa-context/rdfa-1.1
White Spaces in xsd:hexBinary
Some comments on the RDFa 1.1 Core and Primer
Comments on RDFa Core 1.1 Working Draft
Proposed RDFa publication timeline
- Re: Proposed RDFa publication timeline
- Re: Proposed RDFa publication timeline
- Re: Proposed RDFa publication timeline