- From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 11:03:51 -0600
- To: public-rdfa-wg@w3.org
I have removed this diagram from the source. On 1/25/2012 4:43 AM, Ivan Herman wrote: > :-) > > Ivan > > On Jan 25, 2012, at 11:39 , Michael Hausenblas wrote: > >> Please, please, please do me a favour and drop 'my' figure. This is prior art from some four years ago and certainly only confuses people. >> >> /me over and out. >> >> Cheers, >> Michael >> -- >> Dr. Michael Hausenblas, Research Fellow >> LiDRC - Linked Data Research Centre >> DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute >> NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway >> Ireland, Europe >> Tel. +353 91 495730 >> http://linkeddata.deri.ie/ >> http://sw-app.org/about.html >> >> On 25 Jan 2012, at 10:34, Ivan Herman wrote: >> >>> And yet another point... >>> >>> A while ago, when we were discussing the restructuring of the processing steps with @property, I have come up with a complete diagram (well, a series thereof) for the processing steps. >>> >>> http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/Processing >>> >>> I am not sure it is 100% correct, I am not sure it is 100% useful... but I wonder whether this is something we want to use for something. >>> >>> Caveat: I made a mess and I lost the original source for this (I guess it was either keynote or powerpoint) so I would have to reproduce it if we decided to use this. But that can be done, of course. >>> >>> Ivan >>> >>> >>> On Jan 25, 2012, at 11:18 , Ivan Herman wrote: >>> >>>> Taking a somewhat more general view. >>>> >>>> The figure is an updated figure we had in the 1.0 rec, and landed in this document through a comment of Michael Hausenblas. But this was _before_ the radical change on the behaviour of @property. I wonder whether keeping it in the document is actually o.k.: it gives the mistaken impression that this is _the only_ behavioural view of @property which is way off base these days. Ie, we may be better off removing the figure altogether. >>>> >>>> Ivan >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Jan 25, 2012, at 11:01 , Ivan Herman wrote: >>>> >>>>> So, an interesting situation... There are two comments on the figure on @property->literal evaluation: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> - Niklas says: >>>>> >>>>> The image with caption "Literal object resolution" is too big, >>>>> causing scrollbars to appear. >>>>> >>>>> - Manu says: >>>>> >>>>> The image is too small to make out what it says. >>>>> >>>>> The two comments cancel each other out... I am not sure what I should do, if anything. >>>>> >>>>> Ivan >>>>> >>>>> ---- >>>>> Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead >>>>> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ >>>>> mobile: +31-641044153 >>>>> FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> ---- >>>> Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead >>>> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ >>>> mobile: +31-641044153 >>>> FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> ---- >>> Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead >>> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ >>> mobile: +31-641044153 >>> FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> > > ---- > Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead > Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ > mobile: +31-641044153 > FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf > > > > > -- Shane McCarron Managing Director, Applied Testing and Technology, Inc. +1 763 786 8160 x120
Received on Wednesday, 25 January 2012 17:04:22 UTC