- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 11:18:23 +0100
- To: W3C RDFWA WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <52EEF73D-DA58-44D8-A7BA-CA1473747445@w3.org>
Taking a somewhat more general view. The figure is an updated figure we had in the 1.0 rec, and landed in this document through a comment of Michael Hausenblas. But this was _before_ the radical change on the behaviour of @property. I wonder whether keeping it in the document is actually o.k.: it gives the mistaken impression that this is _the only_ behavioural view of @property which is way off base these days. Ie, we may be better off removing the figure altogether. Ivan On Jan 25, 2012, at 11:01 , Ivan Herman wrote: > So, an interesting situation... There are two comments on the figure on @property->literal evaluation: > > > - Niklas says: > > The image with caption "Literal object resolution" is too big, > causing scrollbars to appear. > > - Manu says: > > The image is too small to make out what it says. > > The two comments cancel each other out... I am not sure what I should do, if anything. > > Ivan > > ---- > Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead > Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ > mobile: +31-641044153 > FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf > > > > > ---- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: smime.p7s
Received on Wednesday, 25 January 2012 10:17:02 UTC