Re: comment on the RDFa Core review comments

Taking a somewhat more general view.

The figure is an updated figure we had in the 1.0 rec, and landed in this document through a comment of Michael Hausenblas. But this was _before_ the radical change on the behaviour of @property. I wonder whether keeping it in the document is actually o.k.: it gives the mistaken impression that this is _the only_ behavioural view of @property which is way off base these days. Ie, we may be better off removing the figure altogether.

Ivan




On Jan 25, 2012, at 11:01 , Ivan Herman wrote:

> So, an interesting situation... There are two comments on the figure on @property->literal evaluation:
> 
> 
> - Niklas says:
> 
> The image with caption "Literal object resolution" is too big,
> causing scrollbars to appear.
> 
> - Manu says:
> 
> The image is too small to make out what it says.
> 
> The two comments cancel each other out... I am not sure what I should do, if anything.
> 
> Ivan
> 
> ----
> Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
> Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
> mobile: +31-641044153
> FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 


----
Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead
Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/
mobile: +31-641044153
FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf