- From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 21:11:22 -0600
- To: W3C RDFWA WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <4F16385A.2050200@aptest.com>
Some comments on RDFa Lite 1.1 as per my action item: Disclaimer: I am an "Oxford Comma Nazi". Section 1: It says "The goal was..." I think it should be "The goal is...". Active voice. Present tense. Section 2.1 - the title should be "vocab, typeof, and property" paragraph 2 - "As you will note above, we have specified..." is awkward. How about "In this example we have specified..." Section 2.2 It says "Uniform Resource Locator (URL)" Do we still say URL? I thought it was URI? or IRI? Section 2.3 says "such as|dc|,|foaf|and|schema|." It should be "such as|dc|,|foaf,|and|schema|." Section 3: This sentence "As well as sections marked as non-normative, all authoring guidelines, diagrams, examples, and notes in this specification are non-normative. Everything else in this specification is normative." is awkward. How about "All authoring guidelines, diagrams, examples, and notes in this specification are non-normative. Sections marked specifically as 'non-nomative' are also non-normative. Everything else in this specification is normative." or something... Section 3.1: It says "In order for a document to be labeled as a conforming*RDFa Lite 1.1 document*, it/must/provide the facilities described as mandatory in its Host Language and it/must not/use any additional RDFa attributes other than those described in this specification" This isn't quite right. I think we mean "In order for a document to be labeled as a conforming*RDFa Lite 1.1 document*, it/must/only require the facilities described as mandatory in its Host Language and it/must not/use any additional RDFa attributes other than those described in this specification" Otherwise it looks great! -- Shane McCarron Managing Director, Applied Testing and Technology, Inc. +1 763 786 8160 x120
Received on Wednesday, 18 January 2012 03:11:58 UTC