Re: Official Response to ISSUE-84 from RDF Web Apps WG

Hello Manu,

On behalf of the TAG, thank you for adopting this change :)

Jeni

On 28 Jan 2012, at 17:33, Manu Sporny wrote:

> bcc: www-tag
> 
> Hi Jeni,
> 
> Thank you for your public feedback on the RDFa 1.1 documents. This is an
> official response from the RDF Web Apps WG to your issue before we enter
> the 3rd Last Call for the RDFa 1.1 work this coming Tuesday. The Last
> Call will last for 3 weeks, so there is still time for you to discuss
> your concerns if we have not fully addressed them.
> 
> Your issue was tracked here:
> 
> https://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/track/issues/84
> 
> Explanation of Issue
> --------------------
> 
> The W3C TAG has been concerned about the discussion of fragment
> identifiers in the RDFa Core 1.1 specification. We have tried to apply
> changes, suggested by the TAG, to the document over the past year to
> address these concerns. Most recently, you submitted new text to make
> the issue of minting new IRIs using fragment identifiers a little more
> clear.
> 
> Working Group Decision
> ----------------------
> 
> RESOLVED: Adopt the WWW TAG proposed language on fragment identifiers
> and place it into RDFa Core 1.1
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/meetings/2012-01-19#resolution_1
> 
> We have accepted your suggestion in full.
> 
> Feedback
> --------
> 
> Since this is an official Working Group response to your issue, we would
> appreciate it if you responded to this e-mail and let us know if the
> decision made by the group is acceptable to you as soon as possible.
> 
> -- manu
> 
> -- 
> Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny)
> Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
> blog: PaySwarm vs. OpenTransact Shootout
> http://manu.sporny.org/2011/web-payments-comparison/
> 
> 

-- 
Jeni Tennison
http://www.jenitennison.com

Received on Sunday, 29 January 2012 12:18:59 UTC