- From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2012 13:01:12 -0500
- To: Sebastian Heath <sebastian.heath@gmail.com>
- CC: RDFa WG <public-rdfa-wg@w3.org>
Hi Sebastian, Thank you for your public feedback on the RDFa 1.1 documents. This is an official response from the RDF Web Apps WG to your issue before we enter the 3rd Last Call for the RDFa 1.1 work this coming Tuesday. The Last Call will last for 3 weeks, so there is still time for you to discuss your concerns if we have not fully addressed them. Your issue was tracked here: ISSUE-115: Explanation on the Fragment ID in @about may be misleading https://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/track/issues/115 Explanation of Issue -------------------- You had an editorial concern in RDFa Lite 1.1 in the section on @about: """ The implication of "to link to things on your page" seems clear. "to link" is reasonably understood as using a browser to arrive at "things on your page." The characters 'about="#manu"' will not achieve that goal. """ Editorial Decision ------------------ I re-worded that section to remove the implication that a link would be created in the traditional browser sense: "If you want Web authors to be able to talk about the things on your page, you can identify the thing using a hash and a name." You can view the full text here: http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/drafts/2012/WD-rdfa-lite-20120131/#about Feedback -------- Since this is an official Editorial response to your issue, we would appreciate it if you responded to this e-mail and let us know if the decision made by the group is acceptable to you as soon as possible. -- manu -- Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny) Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. blog: PaySwarm vs. OpenTransact Shootout http://manu.sporny.org/2011/web-payments-comparison/
Received on Saturday, 28 January 2012 18:01:44 UTC