- From: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 16:29:45 +0100
- To: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- Cc: public-rdfa-wg@w3.org
- Message-Id: <C3F80888-EDE1-46AA-B2AE-767DC5C66374@w3.org>
And disallow '//' at the beginning and allow ':'... Ivan On Jan 31, 2012, at 16:19 , Shane McCarron wrote: > The production in that section is the normative definition. Any prose is explanatory. I will try to fix the regex to disallow whitespace. > > On 1/31/2012 7:57 AM, Michael[tm] Smith wrote: >> Ivan Herman<ivan@w3.org>, 2012-01-31 14:20 +0100: >> >>> On Jan 31, 2012, at 13:48 , Michael[tm] Smith wrote: >>> >>> If everything goes as planned, the spec might be updated... today? >> Cool. I hope the regexp in that other section can be updated too, then. >> >>>> That still disallows spaces in the reference part, though. >>> That is intentional:-) >> Yeah my point is the regexp in that other section needs to match what the >> normative part of the spec says. >> >> Actually btw what is the normative definition of a CURIE? You spec has text >> "The lexical space of a CURIE is as defined in curie below.", where the >> word "curie" is hyperlink to part of the BNFy thing that follows. But that >> thing is preceded by text that says, "The general syntax of a CURIE can be >> summarized as follows:..." >> >> I'm looking for an assertion that states unambiguously what a valid CURIE >> is, and "can be summarized" .. would not seem to qualify. >> >> So where can I find the actual normative CURIE definition? >> >> --Mike >> > > -- > Shane McCarron > Managing Director, Applied Testing and Technology, Inc. > +1 763 786 8160 x120 > > ---- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: smime.p7s
Received on Tuesday, 31 January 2012 15:28:01 UTC