- From: RDF Web Applications Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 14:59:36 +0000
- To: public-rdfa-wg@w3.org
ISSUE-125 (Refine CURIE syntax): Should CURIEs be more limited to not trigger on things like http://example.com? [RDFa 1.1 Core] http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/track/issues/125 Raised by: Manu Sporny On product: RDFa 1.1 Core The RDF WG has performed a review of the RDFa Core 1.1 specification. Gavin Carothers (of the RDF WG) pinged me offline and said that they're considering asking us to refine the CURIE syntax to be more restrictive, specifically, so that it uses a modified version of the PN_PREFIX and PN_LOCAL definitions: http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-sparql11-query-20120105/#rPN_PREFIX Note: This would be a backwards-incompatible change, but would probably not result in any great effect on currently deployed RDFa documents. The argument is that languages that use CURIEs should use the same set of allowable characters in PREFIX and REFERENCE.
Received on Wednesday, 18 January 2012 14:59:39 UTC