public-rdfa-wg@w3.org from January 2012 by date

Tuesday, 31 January 2012

• Call for Exclusions: RDFa Core 1.1, XHTML+RDFa 1.1 Ian Jacobs
• In case you have not seen... Ivan Herman
• Re: problem in "CURIE" XML Schema datatype definition Shane McCarron
• Re: problem in "CURIE" XML Schema datatype definition Ivan Herman
• Re: problem in "CURIE" XML Schema datatype definition Shane McCarron
• Re: problem in "CURIE" XML Schema datatype definition Michael[tm] Smith
• Re: problem in "CURIE" XML Schema datatype definition Ivan Herman
• Re: problem in "CURIE" XML Schema datatype definition Michael[tm] Smith
• Re: problem in "CURIE" XML Schema datatype definition Ivan Herman
• problem in "CURIE" XML Schema datatype definition Michael[tm] Smith
• rdf interfaces Reto Bachmann-Gmür

Monday, 30 January 2012

• Re: Official Response to ISSUE-121 from RDF Web Apps WG Ivan Herman
• RE: Official Response to ISSUE-124 from RDF Web Apps WG Paul Cotton
• Re: Official Response to ISSUE-121 from RDF Web Apps WG Sebastian Heath

Sunday, 29 January 2012

• Re: My review of RDFa Core 1.1 (2011-12-15 version) Niklas Lindström
• Re: Official Response to ISSUE-94 from RDF Web Apps WG Jonathan A Rees
• Re: Official Response to ISSUE-84 from RDF Web Apps WG Jeni Tennison

Saturday, 28 January 2012

• Official Response to ISSUE-125 from RDF Web Apps WG Manu Sporny
• Official Response to ISSUE-124 from RDF Web Apps WG Manu Sporny
• Re: Official Response to ISSUE-123 from RDF Web Apps WG Gregg Kellogg
• Re: Official Response to ISSUE-117 from RDF Web Apps WG Gregg Kellogg
• Re: Official Response to ISSUE-114 from RDF Web Apps WG Gregg Kellogg
• Official Response to ISSUE-123 from RDF Web Apps WG Manu Sporny
• Official Response to ISSUE-122 from RDF Web Apps WG Manu Sporny
• Official Response to ISSUE-121 from RDF Web Apps WG Manu Sporny
• Re: Official Response to ISSUE-90 from RDF Web Apps WG Niklas Lindström
• Official Response to ISSUE-117 from RDF Web Apps WG Manu Sporny
• Official Response to ISSUE-115 from RDF Web Apps WG Manu Sporny
• Official Response to ISSUE-114 from RDF Web Apps WG Manu Sporny
• Official Response to ISSUE-108 from RDF Web Apps WG Manu Sporny
• Official Response to ISSUE-94 from RDF Web Apps WG Manu Sporny
• Official Response to ISSUE-90 from RDF Web Apps WG Manu Sporny
• Official Response to ISSUE-84 from RDF Web Apps WG Manu Sporny

Thursday, 26 January 2012

• Review of XHTML+RDFa 1.1 Stéphane Corlosquet
• Another minor issue on RDFa Lite? Ivan Herman
• Re: A real problem with CURIEs and a proposal Ivan Herman
• Re: A real problem with CURIEs and a proposal Niklas Lindström
• Re: My review of RDFa Core 1.1 (2011-12-15 version) Shane McCarron
• Re: RDFa Core 1.1 Ready for Last Call discussion Shane McCarron
• Re: RDFa Core 1.1 Ready for Last Call discussion Gregg Kellogg
• Re: My review of RDFa Core 1.1 (2011-12-15 version) Ivan Herman
• Re: A real problem with CURIEs and a proposal Ivan Herman
• Re: My review of RDFa Core 1.1 (2011-12-15 version) Shane McCarron
• Re: A real problem with CURIEs and a proposal Niklas Lindström
• Re: My review of RDFa Core 1.1 (2011-12-15 version) Niklas Lindström

Wednesday, 25 January 2012

• Re: comment on the RDFa Core review comments Shane McCarron
• Re: A real problem with CURIEs and a proposal Ivan Herman
• Re: comment on the RDFa Core review comments Ivan Herman
• Re: comment on the RDFa Core review comments Michael Hausenblas
• Re: comment on the RDFa Core review comments Ivan Herman
• Re: comment on the RDFa Core review comments Ivan Herman
• comment on the RDFa Core review comments Ivan Herman
• Re: WG comments on XHTML+RDFa for LC publishing (ACTION-111) Ivan Herman
• Re: The 'http' prefix issue Niklas Lindström
• Telecon Agenda - January 26th 2012, 1500 UTC Manu Sporny
• Re: A real problem with CURIEs and a proposal Niklas Lindström

Tuesday, 24 January 2012

• XHTML+RDFa 1.1 Ready for Last Call discussion Shane McCarron
• Re: WG comments on XHTML+RDFa for LC publishing (ACTION-111) Shane McCarron
• RDFa Core 1.1 Ready for Last Call discussion Shane McCarron
• Re: Review of RDFa Core 1.1 (Dec. 15th 2011) Shane McCarron
• Re: My review of RDFa Core 1.1 (2011-12-15 version) Shane McCarron
• Re: A real problem with CURIEs and a proposal Ivan Herman
• Re: A real problem with CURIEs and a proposal Simon Grant
• The 'http' prefix issue Ivan Herman
• Re: A real problem with CURIEs and a proposal Ivan Herman
• A real problem with CURIEs and a proposal Niklas Lindström

Monday, 23 January 2012

• Fwd: IRI types and URI types Shane McCarron

Sunday, 22 January 2012

• Re: Fwd: Review RDFa LC Primer & Lite documents Guus Schreiber
• Re: ACTION-108: RDFa Lite 1.1 Comments Shane McCarron
• Re: Review RDFa LC Primer & Lite documents Ivan Herman
• Re: RDFa Lite 1.1 - ready for Last Call Ivan Herman
• Re: WG comments on RDFa Lite 1.1 for LC publishing, second version (ACTION-106) Ivan Herman

Saturday, 21 January 2012

• RDFa Lite 1.1 - ready for Last Call Manu Sporny
• Re: Fwd: Review RDFa LC Primer & Lite documents Manu Sporny
• Re: ACTION-108: RDFa Lite 1.1 Comments Manu Sporny
• Re: WG comments on RDFa Lite 1.1 for LC publishing, second version (ACTION-106) Manu Sporny

Thursday, 19 January 2012

• My review of RDFa Core 1.1 (2011-12-15 version) Niklas Lindström
• Fwd: Review RDFa LC Primer & Lite documents: relevant to ISSUE-119 (@resource in RDFa Lite instead of @about) Ivan Herman
• Re: Telecon Agenda - January 19th 2012, 1500 UTC Steven Pemberton
• Re: Review of RDFa Core 1.1 (Dec. 15th 2011) Ivan Herman
• Re: ISSUE-126 (HTML5+RDFa conformance): Can use of xmlns: be reported as an error for HTML5+RDFa 1.1? [RDFa 1.1 in HTML5] Ivan Herman
• ISSUE-126 (HTML5+RDFa conformance): Can use of xmlns: be reported as an error for HTML5+RDFa 1.1? [RDFa 1.1 in HTML5] RDF Web Applications Working Group Issue Tracker
• Review of RDFa Core 1.1 (Dec. 15th 2011) Manu Sporny
• Re: Comment from RDF WG on CURIE Alignment with SPARQL and Turtle Niklas Lindström

Wednesday, 18 January 2012

• Fwd: Review RDFa LC Primer & Lite documents Guus Schreiber
• Comment from RDF WG on CURIE Alignment with SPARQL and Turtle Gavin Carothers
• Telecon Agenda - January 19th 2012, 1500 UTC Manu Sporny
• ISSUE-125 (Refine CURIE syntax): Should CURIEs be more limited to not trigger on things like http://example.com? [RDFa 1.1 Core] RDF Web Applications Working Group Issue Tracker
• ACTION-108: RDFa Lite 1.1 Comments Shane McCarron

Tuesday, 17 January 2012

• WG comments on RDFa Lite 1.1 for LC publishing, second version (ACTION-106) Ivan Herman
• Some comments on the timing/planning Ivan Herman
• Oops… I may have reviewed the wrong document... (ACTION-106) Ivan Herman
• WG comments on RDFa Lite 1.1 for LC publishing (ACTION-106) Ivan Herman
• WG comments on XHTML+RDFa for LC publishing (ACTION-111) Ivan Herman
• General LC review comment/question: scope of the general initial context /2011/rdfa-context/rdfa-1.1 Ivan Herman

Monday, 16 January 2012

• Re: White Spaces in xsd:hexBinary Ivan Herman
• Re: White Spaces in xsd:hexBinary Henry Story
• Re: White Spaces in xsd:hexBinary Ivan Herman
• White Spaces in xsd:hexBinary Henry Story

Thursday, 12 January 2012

• Re: Telecon Agenda - January 12th 2012, 1400 UTC Gregg Kellogg
• Re: Telecon Agenda - January 12th 2012, 1400 UTC Niklas Lindström
• Re: Some comments on the RDFa 1.1 Core and Primer Ivan Herman
• Some comments on the RDFa 1.1 Core and Primer Niklas Lindström

Wednesday, 11 January 2012

• Comments on RDFa Core 1.1 Working Draft David Wood

Monday, 9 January 2012

• Re: Proposed RDFa publication timeline Niklas Lindström

Thursday, 5 January 2012

• Re: Proposed RDFa publication timeline Thomas Steiner
• Re: Proposed RDFa publication timeline Gregg Kellogg
• Proposed RDFa publication timeline Manu Sporny

Wednesday, 4 January 2012

• Re: Telecon Agenda - January 12th 2012, 1400 UTC Ivan Herman
• Telecon Agenda - January 12th 2012, 1400 UTC Manu Sporny

Sunday, 1 January 2012

• Happy New Year 2012 International confrence SETIT'12

Last message date: Tuesday, 31 January 2012 23:48:07 UTC