public-rdf-wg@w3.org from April 2012 by subject

"layers" (was Re: the term "named graphs")

"Tagged Graphs" (was Re: complete vs partial graph semantics)

25 April telecon minutes

6.3 -- proposal for (informal) dataset semantics

[ALL] Agenda for 11 April 2012

[Graphs] Semantic Content Packages

[Moderator Action] Case on Europeana data and named graphs

a new spin on contexts -- do they really help with vocabulary mapping?

agenda 18 April telecon

agenda 4 April telecon

Agenda for 25 April 2012

Attempt to provide semantics to Sandro's named graph design

blank nodes as graph labels

Comment on the Dataset proposal (syntax)

complete vs partial graph semantics

Contradicting definitions of “property”

Crawler Example

Fwd: "Tagged Graphs" (was Re: complete vs partial graph semantics)

Fwd: [Moderator Action] Case on Europeana data and named graphs

Fwd: Comment on RDF 1.1: use case for HTML5 data type (on ISSUE-63)

Fwd: Use Case: "Expressing FRBR Descriptions using Named Graphs"

FYI: Two XML Schema Specifications are Recommendations

Graphs Design 6.2

Labelled graphs

Layers

Lens metaphor - was Re: regrets and a new spin on contexts

Meeting Results ( was Re: some GRAPHS strawpolls for today (agenda?) )

more on the term "named graphs"

Named Graphs / Layers / Surfaces / Doohickies added to JSON-LD

New Proposal (6.1) for GRAPHS

RDF Semantics Editors Draft?

RDF with contexts

RDF, RDA, MARC and FRBR

regrets and a new spin on contexts

regrets for the coming telecon

regrets for tomorrow's tele con

Regrets next two weeks

Review of Turtle doc (part 1)

Review of Turtle doc (part 2)

Sandro's proposal VS RDF Datasets

some GRAPHS strawpolls for today (agenda?)

Status of JSON-LD

the term "named graphs"

The way we do things in the Semantic Web community

The way we do things in the Semantic Web community (was: Re: Labelled graphs)

Union or not union for the default graph...

Use Case: "Expressing FRBR Descriptions using Named Graphs"

Last message date: Monday, 30 April 2012 23:11:11 UTC