- From: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
- Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2012 11:18:22 +0100
- To: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Cc: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
On 2012-04-04, at 08:25, Andy Seaborne wrote: > > On 03/04/12 01:27, Sandro Hawke wrote: >>>> There's some misunderstanding here, yes. Maybe you can talk through >>>> > > some particular thing you imagine doing, involving merging and TriG, and >>>> > > I'll be able to pick it up. From what you've written, I'm confused. >>>> > > >>>> > > Maybe I can clarifying by translating this TriG document: >>>> > > >>>> > > <u1> {<a> <b> <c> } >>>> > > >>>> > > into this English declaration: >>>> > > >>>> > > The URI 'u1' denotes something, and that thing has exactly one >>>> > > associated RDF Graph. That associated RDF graph consists of >>>> > > one RDF triple, which we can write in turtle as "<a> <b> <c>". >>> > >>> > >>> > Clearer, but not what I would have expected. >>> > >>> > Why "exactly one associated RDF Graph"? >> My intuition is that there are important thing you can't do if you allow >> more than one graph to be associated with the named object, but I >> haven't really explored that because SPARQL datasets clearly allow only >> one GRAPH for a given name, so I figured we'd stick with that. That's >> why I said hasGraph was a functional property. > > A query executes at some (idealized) point in time, and a query closes the world to execute (or they'd never complete!). An RDF Dataset is the local concept for the data being queried - there's no statement about anything outside the local context made, or needed for SPARQL. +1 This is an important distinction. - Steve -- Steve Harris, CTO Garlik, a part of Experian 1-3 Halford Road, Richmond, TW10 6AW, UK +44 20 8439 8203 http://www.garlik.com/ Registered in England and Wales 653331 VAT # 887 1335 93 Registered office: Landmark House, Experian Way, Nottingham, Notts, NG80 1ZZ
Received on Wednesday, 4 April 2012 10:19:05 UTC