Re: New Proposal (6.1) for GRAPHS

On 10/04/12 23:38, Sandro Hawke wrote:
> Crawlers wont necessarily report all the data from each source.  For
> instance, they could quite plausibly truncate at 100MB source text.
> With 'complete-graphs' semantics, they would have to flag that fact in
> the metadata somewhere; with 'incomplete-graph' semantics, then I expect
> truncating crawlers wouldn't bother to flag it, since their report would
> still be correct.

RDF is monotonic.  Adding some triple can not change the meaning of 
something else; it can only be a further restriction on the 
possibilities described.  Can you show how adding a declaration of 
incompleteness of the graph semantics isn't breaking monontonicity?


Received on Wednesday, 11 April 2012 07:40:53 UTC