public-rdf-wg@w3.org from April 2012 by date

Monday, 30 April 2012

• Regrets next two weeks Alex Hall
• Re: Named Graphs / Layers / Surfaces / Doohickies added to JSON-LD Sandro Hawke
• Re: Layers Thomas Baker
• Re: Layers Sandro Hawke
• Re: Layers Pat Hayes
• Re: Layers Dan Brickley
• Named Graphs / Layers / Surfaces / Doohickies added to JSON-LD Manu Sporny
• Status of JSON-LD Manu Sporny
• Re: Layers Pat Hayes
• Re: regrets and a new spin on contexts Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Sandro's proposal VS RDF Datasets Pat Hayes
• Re: Sandro's proposal VS RDF Datasets Pat Hayes
• Re: regrets and a new spin on contexts Thomas Baker
• Re: regrets and a new spin on contexts Kingsley Idehen
• Re: regrets and a new spin on contexts Thomas Baker
• Re: Labelled graphs Ivan Herman
• Re: Sandro's proposal VS RDF Datasets Andy Seaborne
• Re: blank nodes as graph labels Andy Seaborne
• Re: Labelled graphs Andy Seaborne
• Re: Labelled graphs Pat Hayes
• Re: Labelled graphs Ivan Herman
• Re: Labelled graphs Pat Hayes
• Re: regrets and a new spin on contexts Pat Hayes
• Re: regrets and a new spin on contexts Pat Hayes
• Lens metaphor - was Re: regrets and a new spin on contexts Thomas Baker

Sunday, 29 April 2012

• Layers Sandro Hawke
• Re: blank nodes as graph labels Sandro Hawke
• Re: "layers" (was Re: the term "named graphs") Sandro Hawke
• Re: Sandro's proposal VS RDF Datasets Andy Seaborne
• Re: regrets and a new spin on contexts Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: Sandro's proposal VS RDF Datasets Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: regrets and a new spin on contexts Thomas Baker
• Re: regrets and a new spin on contexts Pat Hayes
• Re: regrets and a new spin on contexts Pat Hayes
• Re: regrets and a new spin on contexts Pat Hayes
• Re: "layers" (was Re: the term "named graphs") Pat Hayes
• Re: Comment on the Dataset proposal (syntax) Pat Hayes
• Re: regrets and a new spin on contexts Pat Hayes
• Re: Comment on the Dataset proposal (syntax) Pat Hayes
• Re: Comment on the Dataset proposal (syntax) Pat Hayes
• Re: Sandro's proposal VS RDF Datasets Pat Hayes
• Re: blank nodes as graph labels Pat Hayes

Saturday, 28 April 2012

• Re: some GRAPHS strawpolls for today (agenda?) Pat Hayes
• Re: some GRAPHS strawpolls for today (agenda?) Pat Hayes
• Re: some GRAPHS strawpolls for today (agenda?) Pat Hayes
• Re: some GRAPHS strawpolls for today (agenda?) William Waites
• Re: some GRAPHS strawpolls for today (agenda?) William Waites
• Re: some GRAPHS strawpolls for today (agenda?) Pat Hayes
• Re: The way we do things in the Semantic Web community (was: Re: Labelled graphs) Pat Hayes
• Re: "layers" (was Re: the term "named graphs") Dan Brickley
• Re: 6.3 -- proposal for (informal) dataset semantics William Waites
• Re: Contradicting definitions of “property” Pat Hayes
• Re: 6.3 -- proposal for (informal) dataset semantics Pat Hayes
• "layers" (was Re: the term "named graphs") Sandro Hawke
• Re: the term "named graphs" Dan Brickley
• Re: the term "named graphs" Andy Seaborne
• Re: the term "named graphs" Sandro Hawke

Friday, 27 April 2012

• blank nodes as graph labels Sandro Hawke
• Re: 6.3 -- proposal for (informal) dataset semantics Andy Seaborne
• Re: the term "named graphs" Andy Seaborne
• Re: the term "named graphs" Sandro Hawke
• Re: the term "named graphs" Jeremy Carroll
• 6.3 -- proposal for (informal) dataset semantics Sandro Hawke
• Re: Contradicting definitions of “property” David Wood
• Re: some GRAPHS strawpolls for today (agenda?) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: some GRAPHS strawpolls for today (agenda?) Sandro Hawke
• Re: Sandro's proposal VS RDF Datasets Sandro Hawke
• Re: The way we do things in the Semantic Web community Andy Seaborne
• Re: The way we do things in the Semantic Web community Sandro Hawke
• Re: Sandro's proposal VS RDF Datasets Andy Seaborne
• Re: some GRAPHS strawpolls for today (agenda?) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Sandro's proposal VS RDF Datasets Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: Sandro's proposal VS RDF Datasets Ivan Herman
• Sandro's proposal VS RDF Datasets Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: The way we do things in the Semantic Web community Andy Seaborne
• Re: the term "named graphs" Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: Graphs Design 6.2 Richard Cyganiak

Thursday, 26 April 2012

• Re: the term "named graphs" Sandro Hawke
• Re: the term "named graphs" Richard Cyganiak
• more on the term "named graphs" Sandro Hawke
• the term "named graphs" Sandro Hawke
• Re: Graphs Design 6.2 Sandro Hawke
• Re: Comment on the Dataset proposal (syntax) Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Comment on the Dataset proposal (syntax) Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: Comment on the Dataset proposal (syntax) Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: Comment on the Dataset proposal (syntax) Richard Cyganiak
• Re: regrets and a new spin on contexts Sandro Hawke
• Re: Comment on the Dataset proposal (syntax) Sandro Hawke
• Re: some GRAPHS strawpolls for today (agenda?) Sandro Hawke
• Comment on the Dataset proposal (syntax) Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: some GRAPHS strawpolls for today (agenda?) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Graphs Design 6.2 Steve Harris
• Re: some GRAPHS strawpolls for today (agenda?) Sandro Hawke
• Re: some GRAPHS strawpolls for today (agenda?) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: regrets and a new spin on contexts Thomas Baker
• Contradicting definitions of “property” Richard Cyganiak

Wednesday, 25 April 2012

• Re: Graphs Design 6.2 Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Graphs Design 6.2 Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Meeting Results ( was Re: some GRAPHS strawpolls for today (agenda?) ) Andy Seaborne
• Re: The way we do things in the Semantic Web community (was: Re: Labelled graphs) Richard Cyganiak
• Re: Labelled graphs Steve Harris
• Re: Graphs Design 6.2 Steve Harris
• Re: The way we do things in the Semantic Web community (was: Re: Labelled graphs) Steve Harris
• Re: Graphs Design 6.2 Sandro Hawke
• Re: The way we do things in the Semantic Web community (was: Re: Labelled graphs) Sandro Hawke
• Re: Graphs Design 6.2 Steve Harris
• Re: Graphs Design 6.2 Steve Harris
• Re: Meeting Results ( was Re: some GRAPHS strawpolls for today (agenda?) ) Gavin Carothers
• Re: some GRAPHS strawpolls for today (agenda?) Steve Harris
• Re: regrets and a new spin on contexts Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Meeting Results ( was Re: some GRAPHS strawpolls for today (agenda?) ) Richard Cyganiak
• The way we do things in the Semantic Web community (was: Re: Labelled graphs) Richard Cyganiak
• Re: regrets and a new spin on contexts Sandro Hawke
• Re: 25 April telecon minutes Sandro Hawke
• Re: regrets and a new spin on contexts Thomas Baker
• 25 April telecon minutes Alex Hall
• Meeting Results ( was Re: some GRAPHS strawpolls for today (agenda?) ) Sandro Hawke
• RDF Semantics Editors Draft? David Wood
• Re: Graphs Design 6.2 Sandro Hawke
• Re: some GRAPHS strawpolls for today (agenda?) Andy Seaborne
• Re: Agenda for 25 April 2012 Charles Greer
• Re: some GRAPHS strawpolls for today (agenda?) Sandro Hawke
• Re: some GRAPHS strawpolls for today (agenda?) Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: some GRAPHS strawpolls for today (agenda?) Ivan Herman
• Re: a new spin on contexts -- do they really help with vocabulary mapping? Richard Cyganiak
• Re: some GRAPHS strawpolls for today (agenda?) Richard Cyganiak
• Re: some GRAPHS strawpolls for today (agenda?) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Graphs Design 6.2 Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: Labelled graphs Sandro Hawke
• Re: some GRAPHS strawpolls for today (agenda?) Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: Labelled graphs Andy Seaborne
• some GRAPHS strawpolls for today (agenda?) Sandro Hawke
• Re: regrets and a new spin on contexts Antoine Zimmermann
• RE: Agenda for 25 April 2012 Bauer, Herbert S. (Scott)
• Re: Labelled graphs Sandro Hawke
• Re: Graphs Design 6.2 Sandro Hawke
• Re: Labelled graphs Sandro Hawke
• Re: Graphs Design 6.2 Ivan Herman
• Re: Labelled graphs Andy Seaborne
• Re: Labelled graphs David Wood
• Re: Graphs Design 6.2 Sandro Hawke
• Re: Labelled graphs Sandro Hawke
• Re: Graphs Design 6.2 Ivan Herman
• Re: Graphs Design 6.2 David Wood
• Re: New Proposal (6.1) for GRAPHS David Wood
• Re: complete vs partial graph semantics David Wood
• Re: New Proposal (6.1) for GRAPHS David Wood
• Re: a new spin on contexts -- do they really help with vocabulary mapping? David Wood
• Re: Labelled graphs Andy Seaborne
• Re: Labelled graphs Sandro Hawke
• Graphs Design 6.2 Sandro Hawke
• Re: Labelled graphs Ivan Herman
• Re: Labelled graphs Ivan Herman
• Re: Labelled graphs Sandro Hawke
• Re: Labelled graphs Steve Harris
• Re: Labelled graphs Sandro Hawke
• Re: complete vs partial graph semantics Sandro Hawke
• a new spin on contexts -- do they really help with vocabulary mapping? Sandro Hawke

Tuesday, 24 April 2012

• regrets for tomorrow's tele con Zhe Wu
• Re: Labelled graphs Andy Seaborne
• Re: "Tagged Graphs" (was Re: complete vs partial graph semantics) David Wood
• Re: complete vs partial graph semantics David Wood
• Re: Labelled graphs Sandro Hawke
• Re: Labelled graphs Andy Seaborne
• Re: Agenda for 25 April 2012 Peter F. Patel-Schneider

Monday, 23 April 2012

• Agenda for 25 April 2012 David Wood
• regrets and a new spin on contexts Pat Hayes

Thursday, 19 April 2012

• Re: agenda 18 April telecon Arnaud Le Hors

Wednesday, 18 April 2012

• Re: agenda 18 April telecon Eric Prud'hommeaux
• Re: agenda 18 April telecon Charles Greer
• Re: agenda 18 April telecon Antoine Zimmermann
• Re: agenda 18 April telecon Peter F. Patel-Schneider
• Re: agenda 18 April telecon Steve Harris

Tuesday, 17 April 2012

• Re: agenda 18 April telecon Andy Seaborne
• agenda 18 April telecon Guus Schreiber
• Re: Labelled graphs Guus Schreiber
• Re: RDF with contexts Antoine Zimmermann

Monday, 16 April 2012

• RDF with contexts Pat Hayes
• [Graphs] Semantic Content Packages David Wood
• Re: Labelled graphs Steve Harris
• Re: Labelled graphs Sandro Hawke
• Re: Labelled graphs Andy Seaborne

Sunday, 15 April 2012

• Re: Labelled graphs Sandro Hawke

Saturday, 14 April 2012

• Re: Labelled graphs Andy Seaborne

Friday, 13 April 2012

• Re: Union or not union for the default graph... Steve Harris
• Re: Union or not union for the default graph... Ivan Herman
• Re: Union or not union for the default graph... Andy Seaborne
• Fwd: "Tagged Graphs" (was Re: complete vs partial graph semantics) Steve Harris
• Re: Labelled graphs Steve Harris
• Labelled graphs Andy Seaborne
• Re: "Tagged Graphs" (was Re: complete vs partial graph semantics) Ivan Herman
• Re: Union or not union for the default graph... Ivan Herman

Thursday, 12 April 2012

• "Tagged Graphs" (was Re: complete vs partial graph semantics) Sandro Hawke
• Re: Union or not union for the default graph... Andy Seaborne
• Re: Union or not union for the default graph... David Wood
• Re: complete vs partial graph semantics Pat Hayes
• Re: complete vs partial graph semantics Sandro Hawke
• Re: complete vs partial graph semantics Andy Seaborne
• Re: complete vs partial graph semantics Sandro Hawke
• Re: complete vs partial graph semantics Sandro Hawke
• Re: Union or not union for the default graph... Andy Seaborne
• Re: Union or not union for the default graph... Ivan Herman
• Re: Union or not union for the default graph... Andy Seaborne
• Union or not union for the default graph... Ivan Herman
• Re: complete vs partial graph semantics Andy Seaborne
• Re: complete vs partial graph semantics Andy Seaborne

Wednesday, 11 April 2012

• Re: complete vs partial graph semantics William Waites
• Re: [ALL] Agenda for 11 April 2012 Pierre-Antoine Champin
• Re: Attempt to provide semantics to Sandro's named graph design Sandro Hawke
• Re: Attempt to provide semantics to Sandro's named graph design Ivan Herman
• Re: Attempt to provide semantics to Sandro's named graph design Sandro Hawke
• complete vs partial graph semantics Sandro Hawke
• Re: Attempt to provide semantics to Sandro's named graph design Ivan Herman
• Re: Attempt to provide semantics to Sandro's named graph design Sandro Hawke
• Re: New Proposal (6.1) for GRAPHS Andy Seaborne
• Re: New Proposal (6.1) for GRAPHS Sandro Hawke
• RE: [ALL] Agenda for 11 April 2012 Bauer, Herbert S. (Scott)
• Re: Attempt to provide semantics to Sandro's named graph design Ivan Herman
• Re: New Proposal (6.1) for GRAPHS Andy Seaborne
• Re: [ALL] Agenda for 11 April 2012 Fabien Gandon
• regrets for the coming telecon Zhe Wu
• Re: Use Case: "Expressing FRBR Descriptions using Named Graphs" Pat Hayes
• Re: [ALL] Agenda for 11 April 2012 Yves Raimond
• Re: [ALL] Agenda for 11 April 2012 Alex Hall
• Re: Review of Turtle doc (part 1) Gavin Carothers

Tuesday, 10 April 2012

• Re: New Proposal (6.1) for GRAPHS Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: Attempt to provide semantics to Sandro's named graph design Sandro Hawke
• Re: New Proposal (6.1) for GRAPHS Sandro Hawke
• Re: Attempt to provide semantics to Sandro's named graph design Ivan Herman
• Re: Attempt to provide semantics to Sandro's named graph design Andy Seaborne
• Re: Attempt to provide semantics to Sandro's named graph design Ivan Herman
• Re: Attempt to provide semantics to Sandro's named graph design Andy Seaborne
• Re: [Moderator Action] Case on Europeana data and named graphs David Wood
• Attempt to provide semantics to Sandro's named graph design Ivan Herman
• Re: Use Case: "Expressing FRBR Descriptions using Named Graphs" Ivan Herman
• Re: Use Case: "Expressing FRBR Descriptions using Named Graphs" David Wood
• Re: Use Case: "Expressing FRBR Descriptions using Named Graphs" David Wood
• Re: Use Case: "Expressing FRBR Descriptions using Named Graphs" Andy Seaborne
• Re: Use Case: "Expressing FRBR Descriptions using Named Graphs" Ivan Herman
• Fwd: Use Case: "Expressing FRBR Descriptions using Named Graphs" Ivan Herman
• Fwd: [Moderator Action] Case on Europeana data and named graphs Ivan Herman
• Re: Review of Turtle doc (part 2) Eric Prud'hommeaux

Monday, 9 April 2012

• Re: Review of Turtle doc (part 2) Gavin Carothers
• Re: Review of Turtle doc (part 2) Zhe Wu
• [ALL] Agenda for 11 April 2012 David Wood
• Re: Review of Turtle doc (part 2) Gavin Carothers
• Review of Turtle doc (part 2) Andy Seaborne

Thursday, 5 April 2012

• Re: New Proposal (6.1) for GRAPHS Arnaud Le Hors
• FYI: Two XML Schema Specifications are Recommendations Ivan Herman
• Re: New Proposal (6.1) for GRAPHS Sandro Hawke
• Fwd: Use Case: "Expressing FRBR Descriptions using Named Graphs" David Wood

Wednesday, 4 April 2012

• Re: New Proposal (6.1) for GRAPHS Arnaud Le Hors
• Re: New Proposal (6.1) for GRAPHS Andy Seaborne
• Re: RDF, RDA, MARC and FRBR David Wood
• Re: New Proposal (6.1) for GRAPHS Sandro Hawke
• Re: New Proposal (6.1) for GRAPHS Lee Feigenbaum
• RDF, RDA, MARC and FRBR David Wood
• Re: New Proposal (6.1) for GRAPHS Steve Harris
• Re: New Proposal (6.1) for GRAPHS Andy Seaborne
• Re: New Proposal (6.1) for GRAPHS Ivan Herman
• Re: New Proposal (6.1) for GRAPHS Arnaud Le Hors

Tuesday, 3 April 2012

• Re: agenda 4 April telecon Scott Bauer
• Re: agenda 4 April telecon Lee Feigenbaum
• Re: agenda 4 April telecon Andy Seaborne
• agenda 4 April telecon Guus Schreiber
• Re: Crawler Example Sandro Hawke
• Re: Crawler Example Andy Seaborne
• Re: New Proposal (6.1) for GRAPHS Ivan Herman
• Crawler Example Sandro Hawke
• Re: New Proposal (6.1) for GRAPHS Sandro Hawke
• Re: New Proposal (6.1) for GRAPHS Sandro Hawke

Monday, 2 April 2012

• Re: New Proposal (6.1) for GRAPHS Charles Greer
• Re: New Proposal (6.1) for GRAPHS Andy Seaborne
• Re: New Proposal (6.1) for GRAPHS Andy Seaborne
• Re: New Proposal (6.1) for GRAPHS Pat Hayes
• Re: New Proposal (6.1) for GRAPHS Ivan Herman
• Re: New Proposal (6.1) for GRAPHS Sandro Hawke
• Re: New Proposal (6.1) for GRAPHS Sandro Hawke
• Re: New Proposal (6.1) for GRAPHS Ivan Herman
• Re: New Proposal (6.1) for GRAPHS Sandro Hawke
• Fwd: Comment on RDF 1.1: use case for HTML5 data type (on ISSUE-63) Ivan Herman
• Re: New Proposal (6.1) for GRAPHS Sandro Hawke

Last message date: Monday, 30 April 2012 23:11:11 UTC