- From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 11:25:33 -0400
- To: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>
- Cc: W3C RDF WG <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
On Wed, 2012-04-11 at 16:55 +0200, Ivan Herman wrote: > > Well... fine with me. But what I am saying is that, from a Semantics > point of view, a label behaves pretty much the same way as a term > typed rdf:Graph. At least by the level of semantics which is on that > page. Yes. rdf:Graph doesn't add to the expressive power; it's just an important convenience feature. It lets us use cc:license (and things like that) instead of defining a new predicate, licenceOfAssociatedGraph. That is: { ?x a rdf:Graph; cc:license <L> } could instead be written as: { ?x eg:licenseOfAssociatedGraph <L> } But... we could explore this a bit more. Maybe it would be okay to just use cc:license without the rdf:Graph declaration. -- Sandro
Received on Wednesday, 11 April 2012 15:25:50 UTC