- From: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
- Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 19:36:56 +0100
- To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Cc: Ivan Herman <ivan@w3.org>, public-rdf-wg <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
On 25 Apr 2012, at 14:28, Sandro Hawke wrote: ... >> Hm. I am not sure I understand this restriction. It forces the user to come up with a URI or a blank node for no good reason. Why is it a problem to say that if I say: >> >> >> @union . >> { a b c } >> d { e f g } >> h { i j k } >> >> then the default graph is >> >> { a b c . >> e f g . >> i j k . >> } >> >> What is wrong with that? It is only a shorthand... > > Yeah, I suppose it's probably okay. I was thinking of union datasets > as a somewhat different kind of dataset. > > If you loaded that into 4store, it would have to make up a graph name, > but maybe that's fine. It has to anyway, it's a quad store*. But in any case, the idea of @union is antithetical to the way these systems are used, see my other mail on the subject. - Steve * In 4store the default graph is called <default:> but other systems use other URIs - it's generally hidden from the users anyway. -- Steve Harris, CTO Garlik, a part of Experian 1-3 Halford Road, Richmond, TW10 6AW, UK +44 20 8439 8203 http://www.garlik.com/ Registered in England and Wales 653331 VAT # 887 1335 93 Registered office: Landmark House, Experian Way, NG2 Business Park, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, England NG80 1ZZ
Received on Wednesday, 25 April 2012 18:37:24 UTC