W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > April 2012

Re: regrets and a new spin on contexts

From: Thomas Baker <tom@tombaker.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 11:21:06 -0400
To: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
Cc: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <20120430152106.GA32566@julius>
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 10:41:52AM -0400, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
> >What I like about "lens" is that a lens, almost by definition, somehow alters
> >-- magnifies, distorts, refracts, corrects, whatever -- the view.  As I see it,
> >people are seeing the context from a particular (point of) "view",
> >"perspective", or "angle", but they are seeing it _through_ the "lens".  It is
> >this instrument -- the lens -- that interests us, not the thinking underlying
> >the design of the lens.

> How about:  "context lenses" ?
> A context oriented lens is basically a specific kind of view.

Hey, that's not bad!  Together with "corrective lenses", "historical lenses",
and "zoom lenses" -- without getting _too_ fancy with the typology -- I see the
makings of a halfway entertaining presentation.


P.S. With "a specific kind of view", I don't think you mean to imply that
"context lens" is somehow formally a sub-class of some broader notion of view,
do you?  Just checking.

Tom Baker <tom@tombaker.org>
Received on Monday, 30 April 2012 15:21:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 22:02:04 UTC