- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 12:03:26 +0100
- To: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
On 17/04/12 16:59, Guus Schreiber wrote: ... > An attempt at formulating a possible conclusion/consensus from this thread: > > * Non-typed labels are simply associations, no special semantics > > * Typed labels: we do not seem to come up with more than these two: > > 1. The label is typed as a rdf:StaticGraphContainer: > the graph labeled is a g-snap of the label URL > 2. The label is types as a rdf:Graph: > the label denotes the graph it labels > > * When the same label is used multiple times in the same dataset, the > graph is > assumed to be the union of the graphs labeled with it > > The appears to be in line to the 6.1 design, with some > modifications/specializations. > > Guus (sorry for the delay - was not at work) Guus - nice summary. Andy
Received on Tuesday, 24 April 2012 11:04:07 UTC