- From: Gavin Carothers <gavin@carothers.name>
- Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 11:18:24 -0700
- To: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Cc: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, public-rdf-wg <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 11:00 AM, Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de> wrote: > On 25 Apr 2012, at 17:43, Sandro Hawke wrote: >>> 2. Named graphs are not asserted >>> >>> "<u> {<a> <b> <c>}" does not entail turtle("<a> <b> <c>") >> >> Agreed, with a little hesitation around the question of whether >> publishing a turtle document on the Web is "asserting" it. > > This WG should go nowhere near the question whether publishing something on the Web is “asserting” it. That's something for the courts to decide. My question (objection) is why publishing a TriG document that says: <u> {<a> <b> <c>} is some how different than publishing a Turtle document Location: <u> <a> <b> <c> I have no idea what that has anything to do with "asserting" in the first place. > > This WG should consider the question what you can do with a piece of information once you've decided that you want to consider it asserted. > > Best, > Richard
Received on Wednesday, 25 April 2012 18:18:54 UTC