W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > April 2012

Re: Meeting Results ( was Re: some GRAPHS strawpolls for today (agenda?) )

From: Gavin Carothers <gavin@carothers.name>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 11:18:24 -0700
Message-ID: <CAPqY83x+X713PAiFrMHUkVEB-SeAuBfot_06Yhi30nJs6wd5Vg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
Cc: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, public-rdf-wg <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 11:00 AM, Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de> wrote:
> On 25 Apr 2012, at 17:43, Sandro Hawke wrote:
>>> 2. Named graphs are not asserted
>>>  "<u> {<a> <b> <c>}" does not entail turtle("<a> <b> <c>")
>> Agreed, with a little hesitation around the question of whether
>> publishing a turtle document on the Web is "asserting" it.
> This WG should go nowhere near the question whether publishing something on the Web is “asserting” it. That's something for the courts to decide.

My question (objection) is why publishing a TriG document that says:

<u> {<a> <b> <c>}

is some how different than publishing a Turtle document

Location: <u>

 <a> <b> <c>

I have no idea what that has anything to do with "asserting" in the first place.

> This WG should consider the question what you can do with a piece of information once you've decided that you want to consider it asserted.
> Best,
> Richard
Received on Wednesday, 25 April 2012 18:18:54 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 22:02:04 UTC