public-rdf-wg@w3.org from April 2012 by author

Alex Hall

• Regrets next two weeks (Monday, 30 April)
• 25 April telecon minutes (Wednesday, 25 April)
• Re: [ALL] Agenda for 11 April 2012 (Wednesday, 11 April)

Andy Seaborne

• Re: Sandro's proposal VS RDF Datasets (Monday, 30 April)
• Re: blank nodes as graph labels (Monday, 30 April)
• Re: Labelled graphs (Monday, 30 April)
• Re: Sandro's proposal VS RDF Datasets (Sunday, 29 April)
• Re: the term "named graphs" (Saturday, 28 April)
• Re: 6.3 -- proposal for (informal) dataset semantics (Friday, 27 April)
• Re: the term "named graphs" (Friday, 27 April)
• Re: The way we do things in the Semantic Web community (Friday, 27 April)
• Re: Sandro's proposal VS RDF Datasets (Friday, 27 April)
• Re: The way we do things in the Semantic Web community (Friday, 27 April)
• Re: Meeting Results ( was Re: some GRAPHS strawpolls for today (agenda?) ) (Wednesday, 25 April)
• Re: some GRAPHS strawpolls for today (agenda?) (Wednesday, 25 April)
• Re: Labelled graphs (Wednesday, 25 April)
• Re: Labelled graphs (Wednesday, 25 April)
• Re: Labelled graphs (Wednesday, 25 April)
• Re: Labelled graphs (Tuesday, 24 April)
• Re: Labelled graphs (Tuesday, 24 April)
• Re: agenda 18 April telecon (Tuesday, 17 April)
• Re: Labelled graphs (Monday, 16 April)
• Re: Labelled graphs (Saturday, 14 April)
• Re: Union or not union for the default graph... (Friday, 13 April)
• Labelled graphs (Friday, 13 April)
• Re: Union or not union for the default graph... (Thursday, 12 April)
• Re: complete vs partial graph semantics (Thursday, 12 April)
• Re: Union or not union for the default graph... (Thursday, 12 April)
• Re: Union or not union for the default graph... (Thursday, 12 April)
• Re: complete vs partial graph semantics (Thursday, 12 April)
• Re: complete vs partial graph semantics (Thursday, 12 April)
• Re: New Proposal (6.1) for GRAPHS (Wednesday, 11 April)
• Re: New Proposal (6.1) for GRAPHS (Wednesday, 11 April)
• Re: Attempt to provide semantics to Sandro's named graph design (Tuesday, 10 April)
• Re: Attempt to provide semantics to Sandro's named graph design (Tuesday, 10 April)
• Re: Use Case: "Expressing FRBR Descriptions using Named Graphs" (Tuesday, 10 April)
• Review of Turtle doc (part 2) (Monday, 9 April)
• Re: New Proposal (6.1) for GRAPHS (Wednesday, 4 April)
• Re: New Proposal (6.1) for GRAPHS (Wednesday, 4 April)
• Re: agenda 4 April telecon (Tuesday, 3 April)
• Re: Crawler Example (Tuesday, 3 April)
• Re: New Proposal (6.1) for GRAPHS (Monday, 2 April)
• Re: New Proposal (6.1) for GRAPHS (Monday, 2 April)

Antoine Zimmermann

• Re: regrets and a new spin on contexts (Sunday, 29 April)
• Re: Sandro's proposal VS RDF Datasets (Sunday, 29 April)
• Re: Sandro's proposal VS RDF Datasets (Friday, 27 April)
• Sandro's proposal VS RDF Datasets (Friday, 27 April)
• Re: the term "named graphs" (Friday, 27 April)
• Re: Comment on the Dataset proposal (syntax) (Thursday, 26 April)
• Re: Comment on the Dataset proposal (syntax) (Thursday, 26 April)
• Comment on the Dataset proposal (syntax) (Thursday, 26 April)
• Re: some GRAPHS strawpolls for today (agenda?) (Wednesday, 25 April)
• Re: Graphs Design 6.2 (Wednesday, 25 April)
• Re: regrets and a new spin on contexts (Wednesday, 25 April)
• Re: agenda 18 April telecon (Wednesday, 18 April)
• Re: RDF with contexts (Tuesday, 17 April)

Arnaud Le Hors

• Re: agenda 18 April telecon (Thursday, 19 April)
• Re: New Proposal (6.1) for GRAPHS (Tuesday, 10 April)
• Re: New Proposal (6.1) for GRAPHS (Thursday, 5 April)
• Re: New Proposal (6.1) for GRAPHS (Wednesday, 4 April)
• Re: New Proposal (6.1) for GRAPHS (Wednesday, 4 April)

Bauer, Herbert S. (Scott)

• RE: Agenda for 25 April 2012 (Wednesday, 25 April)
• RE: [ALL] Agenda for 11 April 2012 (Wednesday, 11 April)

Charles Greer

• Re: Agenda for 25 April 2012 (Wednesday, 25 April)
• Re: agenda 18 April telecon (Wednesday, 18 April)
• Re: New Proposal (6.1) for GRAPHS (Monday, 2 April)

Dan Brickley

• Re: Layers (Monday, 30 April)
• Re: "layers" (was Re: the term "named graphs") (Saturday, 28 April)
• Re: the term "named graphs" (Saturday, 28 April)

David Wood

• Re: Contradicting definitions of “property” (Friday, 27 April)
• RDF Semantics Editors Draft? (Wednesday, 25 April)
• Re: Labelled graphs (Wednesday, 25 April)
• Re: Graphs Design 6.2 (Wednesday, 25 April)
• Re: New Proposal (6.1) for GRAPHS (Wednesday, 25 April)
• Re: complete vs partial graph semantics (Wednesday, 25 April)
• Re: New Proposal (6.1) for GRAPHS (Wednesday, 25 April)
• Re: a new spin on contexts -- do they really help with vocabulary mapping? (Wednesday, 25 April)
• Re: "Tagged Graphs" (was Re: complete vs partial graph semantics) (Tuesday, 24 April)
• Re: complete vs partial graph semantics (Tuesday, 24 April)
• Agenda for 25 April 2012 (Monday, 23 April)
• [Graphs] Semantic Content Packages (Monday, 16 April)
• Re: Union or not union for the default graph... (Thursday, 12 April)
• Re: [Moderator Action] Case on Europeana data and named graphs (Tuesday, 10 April)
• Re: Use Case: "Expressing FRBR Descriptions using Named Graphs" (Tuesday, 10 April)
• Re: Use Case: "Expressing FRBR Descriptions using Named Graphs" (Tuesday, 10 April)
• [ALL] Agenda for 11 April 2012 (Monday, 9 April)
• Fwd: Use Case: "Expressing FRBR Descriptions using Named Graphs" (Thursday, 5 April)
• Re: RDF, RDA, MARC and FRBR (Wednesday, 4 April)
• RDF, RDA, MARC and FRBR (Wednesday, 4 April)

Eric Prud'hommeaux

• Re: agenda 18 April telecon (Wednesday, 18 April)
• Re: Review of Turtle doc (part 2) (Tuesday, 10 April)

Fabien Gandon

• Re: [ALL] Agenda for 11 April 2012 (Wednesday, 11 April)

Gavin Carothers

• Re: Meeting Results ( was Re: some GRAPHS strawpolls for today (agenda?) ) (Wednesday, 25 April)
• Re: Review of Turtle doc (part 1) (Wednesday, 11 April)
• Re: Review of Turtle doc (part 2) (Monday, 9 April)
• Re: Review of Turtle doc (part 2) (Monday, 9 April)

Guus Schreiber

• agenda 18 April telecon (Tuesday, 17 April)
• Re: Labelled graphs (Tuesday, 17 April)
• agenda 4 April telecon (Tuesday, 3 April)

Ivan Herman

• Re: Labelled graphs (Monday, 30 April)
• Re: Labelled graphs (Monday, 30 April)
• Re: Sandro's proposal VS RDF Datasets (Friday, 27 April)
• Re: some GRAPHS strawpolls for today (agenda?) (Wednesday, 25 April)
• Re: Graphs Design 6.2 (Wednesday, 25 April)
• Re: Graphs Design 6.2 (Wednesday, 25 April)
• Re: Labelled graphs (Wednesday, 25 April)
• Re: Labelled graphs (Wednesday, 25 April)
• Re: Union or not union for the default graph... (Friday, 13 April)
• Re: "Tagged Graphs" (was Re: complete vs partial graph semantics) (Friday, 13 April)
• Re: Union or not union for the default graph... (Friday, 13 April)
• Re: Union or not union for the default graph... (Thursday, 12 April)
• Union or not union for the default graph... (Thursday, 12 April)
• Re: Attempt to provide semantics to Sandro's named graph design (Wednesday, 11 April)
• Re: Attempt to provide semantics to Sandro's named graph design (Wednesday, 11 April)
• Re: Attempt to provide semantics to Sandro's named graph design (Wednesday, 11 April)
• Re: Attempt to provide semantics to Sandro's named graph design (Tuesday, 10 April)
• Re: Attempt to provide semantics to Sandro's named graph design (Tuesday, 10 April)
• Attempt to provide semantics to Sandro's named graph design (Tuesday, 10 April)
• Re: Use Case: "Expressing FRBR Descriptions using Named Graphs" (Tuesday, 10 April)
• Re: Use Case: "Expressing FRBR Descriptions using Named Graphs" (Tuesday, 10 April)
• Fwd: Use Case: "Expressing FRBR Descriptions using Named Graphs" (Tuesday, 10 April)
• Fwd: [Moderator Action] Case on Europeana data and named graphs (Tuesday, 10 April)
• FYI: Two XML Schema Specifications are Recommendations (Thursday, 5 April)
• Re: New Proposal (6.1) for GRAPHS (Wednesday, 4 April)
• Re: New Proposal (6.1) for GRAPHS (Tuesday, 3 April)
• Re: New Proposal (6.1) for GRAPHS (Monday, 2 April)
• Re: New Proposal (6.1) for GRAPHS (Monday, 2 April)
• Fwd: Comment on RDF 1.1: use case for HTML5 data type (on ISSUE-63) (Monday, 2 April)

Jeremy Carroll

• Re: the term "named graphs" (Friday, 27 April)

Kingsley Idehen

• Re: regrets and a new spin on contexts (Monday, 30 April)
• Re: regrets and a new spin on contexts (Monday, 30 April)
• Re: regrets and a new spin on contexts (Wednesday, 25 April)

Lee Feigenbaum

• Re: New Proposal (6.1) for GRAPHS (Wednesday, 4 April)
• Re: agenda 4 April telecon (Tuesday, 3 April)

Manu Sporny

• Named Graphs / Layers / Surfaces / Doohickies added to JSON-LD (Monday, 30 April)
• Status of JSON-LD (Monday, 30 April)

Pat Hayes

• Re: Layers (Monday, 30 April)
• Re: Layers (Monday, 30 April)
• Re: Sandro's proposal VS RDF Datasets (Monday, 30 April)
• Re: Sandro's proposal VS RDF Datasets (Monday, 30 April)
• Re: Labelled graphs (Monday, 30 April)
• Re: Labelled graphs (Monday, 30 April)
• Re: regrets and a new spin on contexts (Monday, 30 April)
• Re: regrets and a new spin on contexts (Monday, 30 April)
• Re: regrets and a new spin on contexts (Sunday, 29 April)
• Re: regrets and a new spin on contexts (Sunday, 29 April)
• Re: regrets and a new spin on contexts (Sunday, 29 April)
• Re: "layers" (was Re: the term "named graphs") (Sunday, 29 April)
• Re: Comment on the Dataset proposal (syntax) (Sunday, 29 April)
• Re: regrets and a new spin on contexts (Sunday, 29 April)
• Re: Comment on the Dataset proposal (syntax) (Sunday, 29 April)
• Re: Comment on the Dataset proposal (syntax) (Sunday, 29 April)
• Re: Sandro's proposal VS RDF Datasets (Sunday, 29 April)
• Re: blank nodes as graph labels (Sunday, 29 April)
• Re: some GRAPHS strawpolls for today (agenda?) (Saturday, 28 April)
• Re: some GRAPHS strawpolls for today (agenda?) (Saturday, 28 April)
• Re: some GRAPHS strawpolls for today (agenda?) (Saturday, 28 April)
• Re: some GRAPHS strawpolls for today (agenda?) (Saturday, 28 April)
• Re: The way we do things in the Semantic Web community (was: Re: Labelled graphs) (Saturday, 28 April)
• Re: Contradicting definitions of “property” (Saturday, 28 April)
• Re: 6.3 -- proposal for (informal) dataset semantics (Saturday, 28 April)
• regrets and a new spin on contexts (Monday, 23 April)
• RDF with contexts (Monday, 16 April)
• Re: complete vs partial graph semantics (Thursday, 12 April)
• Re: Use Case: "Expressing FRBR Descriptions using Named Graphs" (Wednesday, 11 April)
• Re: New Proposal (6.1) for GRAPHS (Monday, 2 April)

Peter F. Patel-Schneider

• Re: some GRAPHS strawpolls for today (agenda?) (Friday, 27 April)
• Re: some GRAPHS strawpolls for today (agenda?) (Friday, 27 April)
• Re: some GRAPHS strawpolls for today (agenda?) (Thursday, 26 April)
• Re: some GRAPHS strawpolls for today (agenda?) (Thursday, 26 April)
• Re: some GRAPHS strawpolls for today (agenda?) (Wednesday, 25 April)
• Re: some GRAPHS strawpolls for today (agenda?) (Wednesday, 25 April)
• Re: Agenda for 25 April 2012 (Tuesday, 24 April)
• Re: agenda 18 April telecon (Wednesday, 18 April)

Pierre-Antoine Champin

• Re: [ALL] Agenda for 11 April 2012 (Wednesday, 11 April)

Richard Cyganiak

• Re: Graphs Design 6.2 (Friday, 27 April)
• Re: the term "named graphs" (Thursday, 26 April)
• Re: Comment on the Dataset proposal (syntax) (Thursday, 26 April)
• Re: Comment on the Dataset proposal (syntax) (Thursday, 26 April)
• Contradicting definitions of “property” (Thursday, 26 April)
• Re: Graphs Design 6.2 (Wednesday, 25 April)
• Re: Graphs Design 6.2 (Wednesday, 25 April)
• Re: The way we do things in the Semantic Web community (was: Re: Labelled graphs) (Wednesday, 25 April)
• Re: Meeting Results ( was Re: some GRAPHS strawpolls for today (agenda?) ) (Wednesday, 25 April)
• The way we do things in the Semantic Web community (was: Re: Labelled graphs) (Wednesday, 25 April)
• Re: a new spin on contexts -- do they really help with vocabulary mapping? (Wednesday, 25 April)
• Re: some GRAPHS strawpolls for today (agenda?) (Wednesday, 25 April)

Sandro Hawke

• Re: Named Graphs / Layers / Surfaces / Doohickies added to JSON-LD (Monday, 30 April)
• Re: Layers (Monday, 30 April)
• Layers (Sunday, 29 April)
• Re: blank nodes as graph labels (Sunday, 29 April)
• Re: "layers" (was Re: the term "named graphs") (Sunday, 29 April)
• "layers" (was Re: the term "named graphs") (Saturday, 28 April)
• Re: the term "named graphs" (Saturday, 28 April)
• blank nodes as graph labels (Friday, 27 April)
• Re: the term "named graphs" (Friday, 27 April)
• 6.3 -- proposal for (informal) dataset semantics (Friday, 27 April)
• Re: some GRAPHS strawpolls for today (agenda?) (Friday, 27 April)
• Re: Sandro's proposal VS RDF Datasets (Friday, 27 April)
• Re: The way we do things in the Semantic Web community (Friday, 27 April)
• Re: the term "named graphs" (Thursday, 26 April)
• more on the term "named graphs" (Thursday, 26 April)
• the term "named graphs" (Thursday, 26 April)
• Re: Graphs Design 6.2 (Thursday, 26 April)
• Re: regrets and a new spin on contexts (Thursday, 26 April)
• Re: Comment on the Dataset proposal (syntax) (Thursday, 26 April)
• Re: some GRAPHS strawpolls for today (agenda?) (Thursday, 26 April)
• Re: some GRAPHS strawpolls for today (agenda?) (Thursday, 26 April)
• Re: Graphs Design 6.2 (Wednesday, 25 April)
• Re: The way we do things in the Semantic Web community (was: Re: Labelled graphs) (Wednesday, 25 April)
• Re: regrets and a new spin on contexts (Wednesday, 25 April)
• Re: 25 April telecon minutes (Wednesday, 25 April)
• Meeting Results ( was Re: some GRAPHS strawpolls for today (agenda?) ) (Wednesday, 25 April)
• Re: Graphs Design 6.2 (Wednesday, 25 April)
• Re: some GRAPHS strawpolls for today (agenda?) (Wednesday, 25 April)
• Re: Labelled graphs (Wednesday, 25 April)
• some GRAPHS strawpolls for today (agenda?) (Wednesday, 25 April)
• Re: Labelled graphs (Wednesday, 25 April)
• Re: Graphs Design 6.2 (Wednesday, 25 April)
• Re: Labelled graphs (Wednesday, 25 April)
• Re: Graphs Design 6.2 (Wednesday, 25 April)
• Re: Labelled graphs (Wednesday, 25 April)
• Re: Labelled graphs (Wednesday, 25 April)
• Graphs Design 6.2 (Wednesday, 25 April)
• Re: Labelled graphs (Wednesday, 25 April)
• Re: Labelled graphs (Wednesday, 25 April)
• Re: complete vs partial graph semantics (Wednesday, 25 April)
• a new spin on contexts -- do they really help with vocabulary mapping? (Wednesday, 25 April)
• Re: Labelled graphs (Tuesday, 24 April)
• Re: Labelled graphs (Monday, 16 April)
• Re: Labelled graphs (Sunday, 15 April)
• "Tagged Graphs" (was Re: complete vs partial graph semantics) (Thursday, 12 April)
• Re: complete vs partial graph semantics (Thursday, 12 April)
• Re: complete vs partial graph semantics (Thursday, 12 April)
• Re: complete vs partial graph semantics (Thursday, 12 April)
• Re: Attempt to provide semantics to Sandro's named graph design (Wednesday, 11 April)
• Re: Attempt to provide semantics to Sandro's named graph design (Wednesday, 11 April)
• complete vs partial graph semantics (Wednesday, 11 April)
• Re: Attempt to provide semantics to Sandro's named graph design (Wednesday, 11 April)
• Re: New Proposal (6.1) for GRAPHS (Wednesday, 11 April)
• Re: Attempt to provide semantics to Sandro's named graph design (Tuesday, 10 April)
• Re: New Proposal (6.1) for GRAPHS (Tuesday, 10 April)
• Re: New Proposal (6.1) for GRAPHS (Thursday, 5 April)
• Re: New Proposal (6.1) for GRAPHS (Wednesday, 4 April)
• Re: Crawler Example (Tuesday, 3 April)
• Crawler Example (Tuesday, 3 April)
• Re: New Proposal (6.1) for GRAPHS (Tuesday, 3 April)
• Re: New Proposal (6.1) for GRAPHS (Tuesday, 3 April)
• Re: New Proposal (6.1) for GRAPHS (Monday, 2 April)
• Re: New Proposal (6.1) for GRAPHS (Monday, 2 April)
• Re: New Proposal (6.1) for GRAPHS (Monday, 2 April)
• Re: New Proposal (6.1) for GRAPHS (Monday, 2 April)

Scott Bauer

• Re: agenda 4 April telecon (Tuesday, 3 April)

Steve Harris

• Re: Graphs Design 6.2 (Thursday, 26 April)
• Re: Labelled graphs (Wednesday, 25 April)
• Re: Graphs Design 6.2 (Wednesday, 25 April)
• Re: The way we do things in the Semantic Web community (was: Re: Labelled graphs) (Wednesday, 25 April)
• Re: Graphs Design 6.2 (Wednesday, 25 April)
• Re: Graphs Design 6.2 (Wednesday, 25 April)
• Re: some GRAPHS strawpolls for today (agenda?) (Wednesday, 25 April)
• Re: Labelled graphs (Wednesday, 25 April)
• Re: agenda 18 April telecon (Wednesday, 18 April)
• Re: Labelled graphs (Monday, 16 April)
• Re: Union or not union for the default graph... (Friday, 13 April)
• Fwd: "Tagged Graphs" (was Re: complete vs partial graph semantics) (Friday, 13 April)
• Re: Labelled graphs (Friday, 13 April)
• Re: New Proposal (6.1) for GRAPHS (Wednesday, 4 April)

Thomas Baker

• Re: Layers (Monday, 30 April)
• Re: regrets and a new spin on contexts (Monday, 30 April)
• Re: regrets and a new spin on contexts (Monday, 30 April)
• Lens metaphor - was Re: regrets and a new spin on contexts (Monday, 30 April)
• Re: regrets and a new spin on contexts (Sunday, 29 April)
• Re: regrets and a new spin on contexts (Thursday, 26 April)
• Re: regrets and a new spin on contexts (Wednesday, 25 April)

William Waites

• Re: some GRAPHS strawpolls for today (agenda?) (Saturday, 28 April)
• Re: some GRAPHS strawpolls for today (agenda?) (Saturday, 28 April)
• Re: 6.3 -- proposal for (informal) dataset semantics (Saturday, 28 April)
• Re: complete vs partial graph semantics (Wednesday, 11 April)

Yves Raimond

• Re: [ALL] Agenda for 11 April 2012 (Wednesday, 11 April)

Zhe Wu

• regrets for tomorrow's tele con (Tuesday, 24 April)
• regrets for the coming telecon (Wednesday, 11 April)
• Re: Review of Turtle doc (part 2) (Monday, 9 April)

Last message date: Monday, 30 April 2012 23:11:11 UTC