- From: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
- Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 13:13:50 +0100
- To: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Cc: public-rdf-wg@w3.org
On 2012-04-16, at 13:07, Andy Seaborne wrote: > > On 15/04/12 15:57, Sandro Hawke wrote: >> On Sat, 2012-04-14 at 20:35 +0100, Andy Seaborne wrote: >>> On 13/04/12 11:33, Steve Harris wrote: >>>>> Read that as rdf:aaa to avoid natural language meaning. >>>> I don't get that, but… >>> >>> Natural language can be confusing. >>> >>> <u> rdf:label G . >>> >>> so is<u> labelled by G ? >>> "<u> has a label of G" >>> "G is a label for<u>" >>> >>> or is<u> labelling G ? >>> "<u> is a label for G" >>> "G has a label of<u>" >>> >>> (sometimes it does not matter -- e.g. sameValue). >>> >>> "labelled graphs" is more of the style"<u> is a label of G". >>> >>> All that is needed as the most basic building block is a neutral >>> association of (<u>, G) and that within a dataset (<ui>, Gi) is >>> functional from<ui> to Gi : given a label, find the associated graph. >> >> With these looser semantics, I don't think it needs to be functional. >> Rather, I think we can define it as labeling the associated graph and >> each of its subgraphs. >> >> There would be some kind of deep equivalence between these two datasets: >> >> D1: >> <u> {<a> <b> 1 } >> <u> {<a> <b> 2 } >> and >> D2: >> <u> {<a> <b> 1,2 } >> >> The SPARQL semantics might written in terms of a normal form, where a >> term is only used as a label once, but the other forms would be valid in >> trig and in the RDF Semantics. > > In earlier threads, the proposal was that a TriG document had one graph per label but (syntax) it may be split into separate sections for practical reasons. That matches my intuition about what > <u> {<a> <b> 1 } > <u> {<a> <b> 2 } Is trying to express. - Steve -- Steve Harris, CTO Garlik, a part of Experian 1-3 Halford Road, Richmond, TW10 6AW, UK +44 20 8439 8203 http://www.garlik.com/ Registered in England and Wales 653331 VAT # 887 1335 93 Registered office: Landmark House, Experian Way, Nottingham, Notts, NG80 1ZZ
Received on Monday, 16 April 2012 12:14:27 UTC