Re: some GRAPHS strawpolls for today (agenda?)

On 04/25/2012 11:03 AM, Sandro Hawke wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-04-25 at 10:38 -0400, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
>> This is all predicated on named graphs participating in entailment, which I
>> don't really agree with.
> I don't understand how you're looking at this.   Do you have an
> alternative solution in mind, and does it address many/most of the use
> cases?
Yes, the alternative solution is that RDF datasets are data structures, and 
that entailment is between RDF graphs only.  This does put more into 
application code, but I prefer that in this case.


> 3. Named graphs are opaque
>     "<u>   {<a>   <b>   <c>}"  does not entail "<u>   {<a>   <b>   _:x}"
>> Absolutely NOT!
> I can't tell if you're disagreeing with the entailment or the test case.
> I think the entailment.
>      -- Sandro
Named graphs should not be opaque.

Received on Thursday, 26 April 2012 07:26:43 UTC