- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 03:26:09 -0400
- To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- CC: public-rdf-wg <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>
On 04/25/2012 11:03 AM, Sandro Hawke wrote: > On Wed, 2012-04-25 at 10:38 -0400, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: >> This is all predicated on named graphs participating in entailment, which I >> don't really agree with. > I don't understand how you're looking at this. Do you have an > alternative solution in mind, and does it address many/most of the use > cases? Yes, the alternative solution is that RDF datasets are data structures, and that entailment is between RDF graphs only. This does put more into application code, but I prefer that in this case. [...] > > 3. Named graphs are opaque > > "<u> {<a> <b> <c>}" does not entail "<u> {<a> <b> _:x}" >> Absolutely NOT! > I can't tell if you're disagreeing with the entailment or the test case. > > I think the entailment. > > -- Sandro Named graphs should not be opaque.
Received on Thursday, 26 April 2012 07:26:43 UTC