W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-wg@w3.org > April 2012

Re: some GRAPHS strawpolls for today (agenda?)

From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 03:26:09 -0400
Message-ID: <4F98F891.4070001@gmail.com>
To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
CC: public-rdf-wg <public-rdf-wg@w3.org>

On 04/25/2012 11:03 AM, Sandro Hawke wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-04-25 at 10:38 -0400, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
>> This is all predicated on named graphs participating in entailment, which I
>> don't really agree with.
> I don't understand how you're looking at this.   Do you have an
> alternative solution in mind, and does it address many/most of the use
> cases?
Yes, the alternative solution is that RDF datasets are data structures, and 
that entailment is between RDF graphs only.  This does put more into 
application code, but I prefer that in this case.


> 3. Named graphs are opaque
>     "<u>   {<a>   <b>   <c>}"  does not entail "<u>   {<a>   <b>   _:x}"
>> Absolutely NOT!
> I can't tell if you're disagreeing with the entailment or the test case.
> I think the entailment.
>      -- Sandro
Named graphs should not be opaque.
Received on Thursday, 26 April 2012 07:26:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:04:16 UTC