public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org from April 2016 by thread

RDF Data Shapes WG minutes for 28 April 2016 Arnaud Le Hors (Friday, 29 April)

shapes-ISSUE-158 (ill-typed literals and sh:datatype): ill-typed literals do not always trigger a validation result [SHACL - Core] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker (Friday, 29 April)

ISSUE-141: Proposal for sh:type Holger Knublauch (Friday, 29 April)

shapes-ISSUE-157 (constraint component support): the support for constraint components is incorrectly stated [SHACL Spec] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 28 April)

shapes-ISSUE-156 (property pair constraints): problems in the description of property pair constraints [SHACL Spec] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 28 April)

Re: shapes-ISSUE-123 (DirectType syntax): Shall we unify the syntax of sh:directType and sh:class? [SHACL - Core] Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Thursday, 28 April)

shapes-ISSUE-155 (property pair constraints): problems in the description of property pair constraints [SHACL Spec] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 28 April)

shapes-ISSUE-154 (value set not defined): the description of sh:equals and sh:disjoint use the term "value set", which is not defined RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 28 April)

shapes-ISSUE-153 (sh:sourceConstraintComponent modality): sh:sourceConstraintComponent is not required but some wording indicates that it is [SHACL Spec] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 28 April)

shapes-ISSUE-152 (sh:labelTemplate not defined): sh:labelTemplate should be defined for all its uses [SHACL Spec] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker (Thursday, 28 April)

RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 28 April 2016 Arnaud Le Hors (Wednesday, 27 April)

Some ISSUE proposals for this week Holger Knublauch (Wednesday, 27 April)

ISSUE-107: Declaring SPARQL variable for sh:Parameters Holger Knublauch (Monday, 25 April)

ISSUE-105: Prefixes in SPARQL fragments Holger Knublauch (Friday, 22 April)

ISSUE-105: Proposal based on sh:prefix Holger Knublauch (Friday, 22 April)

RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 21 April 2016 Arnaud Le Hors (Friday, 22 April)

RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 21 April 2016 Arnaud Le Hors (Wednesday, 20 April)

New metamodel/SPARQL sections Holger Knublauch (Wednesday, 20 April)

sh:Shape and rdfs:class Karen Coyle (Wednesday, 20 April)

shapes-ISSUE-151 (illegal shapes): shape for sh:and is illegal [SHACL Spec] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker (Monday, 18 April)

More wording Karen Coyle (Monday, 18 April)

shapes-ISSUE-150 (nested severities): Treatment of nested severities [SHACL Spec] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker (Monday, 18 April)

shapes-ISSUE-149 (? vs $ in nodeKind): the SPARQL codefor nodeKind uses both ?value and $value [SHACL - Core] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker (Monday, 18 April)

Re: refactored syntax document available Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Saturday, 16 April)

Clarifying word Karen Coyle (Saturday, 16 April)

shapes-ISSUE-148 (scope syntax): non-uniform syntax in scopes [SHACL - Core] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker (Friday, 15 April)

Re: Selected problems with Proposal 4 Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Thursday, 14 April)

RDF Data Shapes WG minutes for 14 April 2016 Arnaud Le Hors (Thursday, 14 April)

regrets for April 21 and April 28 Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Thursday, 14 April)

Shapes and/vs constraints Karen Coyle (Thursday, 14 April)

ISSUE-22: Suggested revision of wording on recursion Holger Knublauch (Thursday, 14 April)

RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 14 April 2016 Arnaud Le Hors (Wednesday, 13 April)

Moving forward with part 2 of the spec Holger Knublauch (Tuesday, 12 April)

Re: implementation of core SHACL (using proposed syntax) Holger Knublauch (Tuesday, 12 April)

Current ShEx RDF metamodel? Holger Knublauch (Tuesday, 12 April)

ISSUE-78: Proposal for Abstract Classes Constraint Jim Amsden (Monday, 11 April)

valid and invalid shapes (ISSUE-134) Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Monday, 11 April)

Re: shapes-ISSUE-141 (Mixed ranges): How to represent mixed datatype-or-class ranges [SHACL - Core] Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Monday, 11 April)

shapes-ISSUE-147 (vocabulary tyops): misspelled vocabulary in specification document [SHACL Spec] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker (Sunday, 10 April)

new version of Validating and Describing Linked Data Portals using Shapes submtited to SWJ Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Saturday, 9 April)

shapes-ISSUE-146 (sh:qualifiedMinCount ): treatment of unbound results from sh:hasShape in sh:qualifiedMinCount (and elsewhere) [SHACL - Core] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker (Friday, 8 April)

shapes-ISSUE-145 (minExclusive code incorrect): the SPARQL code for sh:minExclusive is incorrect [SHACL - Core] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker (Friday, 8 April)

shapes-ISSUE-144 (substitution): substition is sometimes used instead of pre-binding [SHACL Spec] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker (Friday, 8 April)

shapes-ISSUE-143 (pre-binding in core): more pre-binding is needed in Section 3 [SHACL - Core] RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker (Friday, 8 April)

Re: shapes-ISSUE-132 (sh:predicate in constraints): sh:predicate is used in many constraints but not always available [SHACL - Core] Holger Knublauch (Friday, 8 April)

ISSUE-139: Cases where constraint components do not make sense Holger Knublauch (Friday, 8 April)

RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes 7 April 2016 Arnaud Le Hors (Friday, 8 April)

ISSUE-131: Cleaned up definition of sh:hasShape Holger Knublauch (Thursday, 7 April)

fundamental problems with SHACL Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Thursday, 7 April)

the current situation with respect to ISSUE-134 Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Thursday, 7 April)

RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 7 April 2016 Arnaud Le Hors (Wednesday, 6 April)

Some issues that may be close to resolution Holger Knublauch (Wednesday, 6 April)

ISSUE-101: Can we close this? Holger Knublauch (Wednesday, 6 April)

ISSUE-110: Can we close this? Holger Knublauch (Wednesday, 6 April)

Re: shapes-ISSUE-124 (sh:group): sh:group is only mentioned in examples [SHACL - Core] Holger Knublauch (Wednesday, 6 April)

Re: shapes-ISSUE-125 (sh:NodeConstraint missing): sh:NodeConstraint is mentioned but never defined [SHACL Spec] Holger Knublauch (Wednesday, 6 April)

Re: shapes-ISSUE-134 (knowing inverse): does SHACL syntax distinguish inverse property constraints [SHACL Spec] Holger Knublauch (Wednesday, 6 April)

RDF Data Shapes WG Minutes for 31 March 2016 Arnaud Le Hors (Friday, 1 April)

proposed user-friendly syntax for SHACL Peter F. Patel-Schneider (Friday, 1 April)

Last message date: Friday, 29 April 2016 18:53:38 UTC