Re: Current ShEx RDF metamodel? from Simon Steyskal on 2016-04-12 (public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org from April 2016)

From: Simon Steyskal <simon.steyskal@wu.ac.at>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 07:07:30 +0200
To: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
Cc: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <f4d295f1ebc5b9e310fe464b1d810c7e@wu.ac.at>

FWIW,

I guess that page might be outdated given its history of last changes:

(cur | prev) 18:53, 4 April 2014‎ Jessevdam (Talk | contribs)‎ . . 
(17,859 bytes) (-85)‎ . . (→‎Example data)
(cur | prev) 18:52, 4 April 2014‎ Jessevdam (Talk | contribs)‎ . . 
(17,944 bytes) (+136)‎ . . (→‎SHEX schema in RDF)

br,
simon

---
DDipl.-Ing. Simon Steyskal
Institute for Information Business, WU Vienna

www: http://www.steyskal.info/  twitter: @simonsteys

Am 2016-04-12 05:04, schrieb Holger Knublauch:
> ShEx folks,
> 
> is there a reasonably up to date RDF metamodel/vocabulary for ShEx 
> somewhere?
> 
> Peter stated that ShEx does not distinguish between shapes and
> constraints. However, the first hit on Google
> 
> https://www.w3.org/2001/sw/wiki/ShEx/RDF_serialization
> 
> uses a syntax similar to Resource Shapes, where Shapes and
> Property(Constraints) are separated.
> 
> Thanks
> Holger

Received on Tuesday, 12 April 2016 05:07:58 UTC