W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org > April 2016

Re: the current situation with respect to ISSUE-134

From: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 19:42:22 +1000
To: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <5718A07E.3080500@topquadrant.com>
On 12/04/2016 0:37, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
> On 04/07/2016 05:53 PM, Holger Knublauch wrote:
>> This is a valid example. The current spec states that
>> - the classes only count as disjoint if they have rdf:type triples (i.e.
>> subtype inference is not applied)
> The spec does not so state.

The new version of the spec includes a different policy (from Dimitris):

However, all constraint types are pairwise disjoint and no more than one 
property of|sh:property|,|sh:inverseProperty|and|sh:constraint|can link 
to the same RDF node within the sameshapes graph.

Holger
Received on Thursday, 21 April 2016 09:42:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:30:31 UTC