- From: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
- Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2016 11:15:24 -0700
- To: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
On 4/14/16 9:27 AM, Jim Amsden wrote: > Why do we need that? Possibly because classes and properties are > different things and its useful to have different ways of describing > constraints on them. Thanks Jim. That makes sense, and Holger says something similar, but isn't the main reason for the SHACL effort that it is not possible to constrain RDF in this way? So how are these constraints defined? Is SHACL needed to define these constraints on SHACL classes? kc -- Karen Coyle kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net m: 1-510-435-8234 skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600
Received on Thursday, 14 April 2016 18:15:56 UTC