Re: shapes-ISSUE-154 (value set not defined): the description of sh:equals and sh:disjoint use the term "value set", which is not defined from Holger Knublauch on 2016-04-28 (public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org from April 2016)

From: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 17:18:02 +1000
To: RDF Data Shapes Working Group <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <0eb0c8ae-f6bd-dadf-8f29-87a6becb90ff@topquadrant.com>

I have a process question. Do we really need formal ISSUEs for all these 
small editorial problems? I find this a bit over the top. A simple email 
would suffice and take less WG time.

Holger


On 28/04/2016 16:51, RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
> shapes-ISSUE-154 (value set not defined): the description of sh:equals and sh:disjoint use the term "value set", which is not defined
>
> http://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/track/issues/154
>
> Raised by: Dean Allemang
> On product:
>
> There is no description or definition of "value set", which is used in the description of sh:equals and sh:disjoint.
>
>
>

Received on Thursday, 28 April 2016 07:18:36 UTC