Re: shapes-ISSUE-147 (vocabulary tyops): misspelled vocabulary in specification document [SHACL Spec] from Holger Knublauch on 2016-04-10 (public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org from April 2016)

From: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 09:10:32 +1000
To: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <570ADD68.8090306@topquadrant.com>

Fixed here

https://github.com/w3c/data-shapes/commit/8dfab1143dfc49ba01bc2def23c4338b45d086ce

The last four items in your list are actually correct but use the 
inofficial draft pre-dating Proposal 3 that will eventually be replaced 
anyway.

On the plural forms, I have moved the s outside of the <code> block.

Thanks for reporting these,
Holger


On 11/04/2016 8:46, RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
> shapes-ISSUE-147 (vocabulary tyops): misspelled vocabulary in specification document [SHACL Spec]
>
> http://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/track/issues/147
>
> Raised by: Peter Patel-Schneider
> On product: SHACL Spec
>
> There are several vocabulary names that appear to be misspelled in the specification document
>
> sh:classScope
> sh:scopeNodee
> sh:PropertyConstraints
> sh:InversePropertyConstraints
> sh:Violations
> sh:ValidationFunctions
> sh:TemplateScope 
> sh:TemplateConstraint
> sh:argX
>
> A few of these are plurals where the "s" has been melded into the vocabulary name.
>
>
>

Received on Sunday, 10 April 2016 23:11:05 UTC