Re: implementation of core SHACL (using proposed syntax)

On 04/13/2016 02:49 AM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
> 
> 
> On 04/12/2016 10:40 PM, Holger Knublauch wrote:
>> On 13/04/2016 1:11, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
>>[...]

>> This also confirms two limitations of this single-query-transformation
>> approach (we had discussed this before):
>> - inability to generate nested validation results
>> - inability to handle recursion
>> The current design uses sh:hasShape which doesn't have these limitations.
>>
>> Holger

I just made a minor modification to the way that validation results are
combined to allow for nested validation results.

peter

Received on Wednesday, 13 April 2016 19:29:45 UTC