Re: RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 21 April 2016

Thank you for clarifying Jose.
--
Arnaud  Le Hors - Senior Technical Staff Member, Open Web Technologies - 
IBM Cloud


Jose Emilio Labra Gayo <jelabra@gmail.com> wrote on 04/21/2016 08:55:30 
AM:

> From: Jose Emilio Labra Gayo <jelabra@gmail.com>
> To: Arnaud Le Hors/Cupertino/IBM@IBMUS
> Cc: RDF Data Shapes Working Group <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>
> Date: 04/21/2016 08:55 AM
> Subject: Re: RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 21 April 2016
> 
> I noticed that there was a wrong name for one of the issues in the 
> Proposals page. 
> 
> It was Issue-57 whose original name was "Group cardinality" but 
> appeared as "Qualified cardinality" in the proposals page. I think 
> it could give a false impression that qualified cardinalities are 
> already supported in SHACL, so the Issue could be easily closed.

> However, the issue was about cardianalities over groups of 
> expressions which are more complex to handle and, as far as I know, 
> they are not currently supported by the current spec.

> Although I raised the issue, I would not oppose to leave 
> cardinalities over groups out of current SHACL, however, I think the
> proposal should signal that this expressivity is not handled. I 
> updated the proposals page according to this:
> 
> 
https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/wiki/Proposals#ISSUE-57:_Group_cardinality


> Regards, Jose Labra
> 
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 1:05 AM, Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com> 
wrote:
> There seems to be a set of issues we might be able to close, pretty 
> much as a mere administrative matter.
> Otherwise I selected some issues for which Peter's position is known
> given that he sent regrets.
> 
> https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2016.04.21
> --
> Arnaud  Le Hors - Senior Technical Staff Member, Open Web 
> Technologies - IBM Cloud

> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> -- Jose Labra