W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org > April 2016

Re: shapes-ISSUE-154 (value set not defined): the description of sh:equals and sh:disjoint use the term "value set", which is not defined

From: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 07:47:16 -0700
To: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <57222274.1090608@kcoyle.net>
Actually, I find it confusing since the particular properties are 
defined as a pair. In this case, "values" would work just fine:

"sh:equals constrains a pair of properties so that the value of each of 
the properties at a given focus node must be equal."

or

"sh:equals constrains a pair of properties so that the values of the 
properties at a given focus node must be equal."

There's no set, just two distinct values.

kc

On 4/28/16 12:23 AM, Holger Knublauch wrote:
> The term "value set" is used with its intuitive plain english meaning,
> based on the assumption that the reader knows what the team "value" of a
> property means. A value set is then simply the set of all values. How
> could this be misinterpreted by anyone?
>
> Holger
>
>
> On 28/04/2016 16:51, RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
>> shapes-ISSUE-154 (value set not defined): the description of sh:equals
>> and sh:disjoint use the term "value set", which is not defined
>>
>> http://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/track/issues/154
>>
>> Raised by: Dean Allemang
>> On product:
>>
>> There is no description or definition of "value set", which is used in
>> the description of sh:equals and sh:disjoint.
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>

-- 
Karen Coyle
kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net
m: 1-510-435-8234
skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600
Received on Thursday, 28 April 2016 14:47:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:30:31 UTC