- From: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
- Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 07:47:16 -0700
- To: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
Actually, I find it confusing since the particular properties are defined as a pair. In this case, "values" would work just fine: "sh:equals constrains a pair of properties so that the value of each of the properties at a given focus node must be equal." or "sh:equals constrains a pair of properties so that the values of the properties at a given focus node must be equal." There's no set, just two distinct values. kc On 4/28/16 12:23 AM, Holger Knublauch wrote: > The term "value set" is used with its intuitive plain english meaning, > based on the assumption that the reader knows what the team "value" of a > property means. A value set is then simply the set of all values. How > could this be misinterpreted by anyone? > > Holger > > > On 28/04/2016 16:51, RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker wrote: >> shapes-ISSUE-154 (value set not defined): the description of sh:equals >> and sh:disjoint use the term "value set", which is not defined >> >> http://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/track/issues/154 >> >> Raised by: Dean Allemang >> On product: >> >> There is no description or definition of "value set", which is used in >> the description of sh:equals and sh:disjoint. >> >> >> > > > -- Karen Coyle kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net m: 1-510-435-8234 skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600
Received on Thursday, 28 April 2016 14:47:47 UTC